Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Guidelines highlight gaps in research evidence
- PMID: 11859056
- PMCID: PMC1122400
Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Guidelines highlight gaps in research evidence
Comment on
-
Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population.BMJ. 2001 Jun 16;322(7300):1457-60; discussion 1460-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11408301 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2001.
-
- Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy: eighth annual report. London: Department of Health; 2001.
-
- Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnam SS. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800–806. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources