Dimensions of consonant perception in normal and hearing-impaired listeners
- PMID: 1186154
- DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1803.444
Dimensions of consonant perception in normal and hearing-impaired listeners
Abstract
Judgments of consonant similarity were obtained from subjects who had normal hearing, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or relatively flat sensorineural hearing loss. The individual differences model through program INDSCAL was used to derive a set of perceptual features empirically from the similarity judgments, and to group the subjects on the basis of strength of feature usage. The analysis revealed that sonorance was the dominant dimension in the similarity judgments of the subjects with high-frequency hearing losses, while sibilance tended to dominate the judgments of the subjects with flat audiometric configurations. The normal-hearing subjects tended to weight these two dimensions approximately equally. These differences in similarity judgments were observed based upon audiometric configuration, despite the fact that the two hearing-impaired groups were not unique in word-recognition ability.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions.J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Mar;21(1):5-36. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.05. J Speech Hear Res. 1978. PMID: 642487
-
Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Dec;19(4):718-48. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1904.718. J Speech Hear Res. 1976. PMID: 1003952
-
Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Oct;72(4):1124-30. doi: 10.1121/1.388321. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982. PMID: 7142577
-
Identification and discrimination of vowel-consonant syllables in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Dec;18(4):773-94. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1804.773. J Speech Hear Res. 1975. PMID: 1207107
-
Word-frequency effect and response bias.Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/h0024206. Psychol Rev. 1967. PMID: 5341440 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):607-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4807474. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 23862835 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):460-73. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0239). Epub 2011 Dec 22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22199184 Free PMC article.
-
Some perceptual properties of consonants in multitalker babble.Percept Psychophys. 1985 Jul;38(1):81-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03202928. Percept Psychophys. 1985. PMID: 4069963 No abstract available.
-
Error Patterns Analysis of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users as a Function of Noise.J Audiol Otol. 2015 Dec;19(3):144-53. doi: 10.7874/jao.2015.19.3.144. Epub 2015 Dec 18. J Audiol Otol. 2015. PMID: 26771013 Free PMC article.
-
A Data-driven Distance Metric for Evaluating the effects of Dynamic Range Compression in Adverse Conditions.Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192302. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192302. Trends Hear. 2023. PMID: 37559477 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources