Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior
- PMID: 11863035
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.137
Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior
Abstract
The stochastic difference model assumes that decision makers trade normalized attribute value differences when making choices. The model is stochastic, with choice probabilities depending on the normalized difference variable, d, and a decision threshold, delta. The decision threshold indexes a person's sensitivity to attribute value differences and is a free estimated parameter of the model. Depending on the choice context, a person may be more or less sensitive to attribute value differences, and hence delta may be used to measure context effects. With proportional difference used as the normalization, the proportional difference model (PD) was tested with 9 data sets, including published data (e.g., J. L. Myers, M. M. Suydam, & B. Gambino, 1965; A. Tversky, 1969). The model accounted for individual and group data well and described violations of stochastic dominance, independence, and weak and strong stochastic transitivity.
Similar articles
-
Context effects: the proportional difference model and the reflection of preference.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):942-54. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.942. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003. PMID: 14516226
-
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.Psychol Rev. 1993 Jul;100(3):432-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432. Psychol Rev. 1993. PMID: 8356185 Review.
-
Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity.Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Jan;77(1):44-83. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2816. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999. PMID: 9924141
-
Transitivity of preferences.Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):42-56. doi: 10.1037/a0021150. Psychol Rev. 2011. PMID: 21244185
-
A dual system model of preferences under risk.Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):243-55. doi: 10.1037/a0017884. Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 20063971 Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic investigation into the reliability of inter-temporal choice model parameters.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1294-1322. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02241-7. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 36877362 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Choice theories: What are they good for?J Consum Psychol. 2013 Jan 1;23(1):154-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.004. J Consum Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23794793 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.Cogn Psychol. 2007 Nov;55(3):196-231. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Nov 13. Cogn Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17094958 Free PMC article.
-
Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms.Front Neurosci. 2012 May 24;6:70. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00070. eCollection 2012. Front Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22654730 Free PMC article.
-
Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):985-1000. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.985. Mem Cognit. 2009. PMID: 19744938
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources