Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):570-7.

[Restraint and seclusion in psychiatry: review and prospects]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11865564
Review

[Restraint and seclusion in psychiatry: review and prospects]

[Article in French]
J Palazzolo et al. Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

In this article, the authors reviewed the literature published since 1965 concerning restraint and seclusion. They synthesized the contents of the articles reviewed using the categories of indications and contraindications; rates of seclusion and restraint as well as demographic, clinical, and environmental factors that affect these rates; effects on patients and staff; implementation; and training. The literature on restraint and seclusion supports the following: 1) Seclusion and restraint are basically efficacious in preventing injury and reducing agitation; 2) It is nearly impossible to operate a program for severely symptomatic individuals without some form of seclusion or physical or mechanical restraint; 3) Demographic and clinical factors have limited influence on rates of restraint and seclusion; 4) Training in prediction and prevention of violence, in self-defense, and in implementation of restraint and/or seclusion is valuable in reducing rates and untoward effects; 5) Studies comparing well-defined training programs have potential usefulness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources