Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds

Abstract

In this prospective randomized controlled trial of the cost benefits of the choice of dressings in acute surgical wounds left to heal by secondary intention, patients had their wounds dressed with either a traditional dressing (ribbon gauze soaked in proflavine) or a modern hydrofibre dressing. Results showed that the hydrofibre dressing, although more expensive than the ribbon gauze, facilitated an earlier discharge from hospital (P = 0.001). The total cost of the patient episode was less in the hydrofibre group (P = 0.01). In an average UK health authority of 300,000 population, 100 bed days a year could be saved releasing an overall potential saving of 55,000 Pounds. A modern hydrofibre dressing allows more effective use of scarce hospital beds and precious financial resources, while still maintaining high quality patient care. It is important that clinical specialists and purchasers of health care should be aware of this clinical and cost-effective advance in the management of acute surgical wounds.