Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar;87(3):271-8.

A chromogenic substrate method for detecting and titrating anti-factor VIII antibodies in the presence of lupus anticoagulant

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11869939

A chromogenic substrate method for detecting and titrating anti-factor VIII antibodies in the presence of lupus anticoagulant

Alicia N Blanco et al. Haematologica. 2002 Mar.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The development of neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies (a-fVIII) is a major clinical complication. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) might affect detection of a-fVIII, since both inhibitors may act on the same coagulation pathway. Our aim was to accomplish unequivocal detection and titration of a-fVIII even in the presence of LA.

Design and methods: We evaluated a-fVIII activity by a chromogenic substrate (CS) method in samples with a-fVIII (n=6), LA (n=12) and presumably both LA+a-fVIII (n=5). The inhibition index before (Ii) and after incubation at 37 C (Ii(37)) was estimated. We also performed factor VIII assays (one-stage and CS) and titration methods (Bethesda and CS) in parallel.

Results: Inhibition in the a-fVIII group (Ii=5-3200) was potentiated by incubation (Ii(37)=27-5200) as it was in LA+a-fVIII (Ii=9-21; Ii(37)=50-903). LA samples showed no or meaningless inhibitory effect (Ii=0-7; Ii(37)=0-4) or a-fVIII activity (0.00-0.06 CSU/ml) by the CS method; on the contrary, very low to moderate (0.52-7.00 BU/ml) a-fVIII activity was recorded by the Bethesda method. The two titration methods did not correlate (p>0.100) in the presence of LA, or LA+a-fVIII. Differences between factor VIII:C and factor VIIIcs were significant only in LA samples (p=0.005); however, patients with residual factor VIII activity from the LA+a-fVIII group also showed higher factor VIIIcs values than factor VIII:C ones.

Interpretation and conclusions: Results indicate the possibility of detecting and titrating a-fVIII without interference of LA by the CS method. This marks a difference with respect to the Bethesda method, in which a measurable effect can be expected in the presence of a strong LA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types