Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar;35(3):630-4.
doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.31722.

Hepatic arterial buffer response in patients with advanced cirrhosis

Affiliations

Hepatic arterial buffer response in patients with advanced cirrhosis

Veit Gülberg et al. Hepatology. 2002 Mar.

Abstract

Hepatic arterial buffer response (HABR) is considered an important compensatory mechanism to maintain perfusion of the liver by hepatic arterial vasodilation on reduction of portal venous perfusion. HABR has been suggested to be impaired in patients with advanced cirrhosis. In patients with hepatopetal portal flow, placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) reduces portal venous liver perfusion. Accordingly, patients with severe cirrhosis should have impaired HABR after TIPS implantation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TIPS on HABR as reflected by changes in resistance index (RI) of the hepatic artery. A total of 366 patients with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A, 106; class B, 168; class C, 92) underwent duplex Doppler ultrasonographic examination with determination of RI and maximal flow velocity in the portal vein before and 1 month after TIPS placement. Portosystemic pressure gradient was determined before and after TIPS placement. In 29 patients with hepatofugal portal blood flow, RI was significantly lower than in 337 patients with hepatopetal flow (0.63 plus minus 0.02 vs. 0.69 plus minus 0.01; P <.001). TIPS induced a significant decrease of the RI in patients with hepatopetal flow (RI, 0.69 plus minus 0.01 before vs. 0.64 plus minus 0.01 after TIPS; P =.001) but not in patients with hepatofugal flow (RI, 0.63 plus minus 0.02 before vs. 0.63 plus minus 0.02 after TIPS; NS). This response was not dependent on the Child-Pugh class. In conclusion, our results suggest that some degree of HABR is preserved even in patients with advanced cirrhosis with significant portal hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by