Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in turkey samples: evaluation of two automated enzyme immunoassays and conventional microbiological techniques
- PMID: 11872135
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01568.x
Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in turkey samples: evaluation of two automated enzyme immunoassays and conventional microbiological techniques
Abstract
Aims: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of two automated enzyme immunoassays (EIA), EiaFoss and Minividas, and a conventional microbiological culture technique for detecting thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in turkey samples.
Methods and results: A total of 286 samples (faecal, meat, neckskin and environmental samples) were collected over a period of 4 months at a turkey slaughterhouse and meat-cutting plant in Denmark. Faecal and environmental samples were tested by the conventional culture method and by the two EIAs, whereas meat and neckskin samples were tested by the two EIAs only. Two enrichment broths were used, Campylobacter Enrichment Broth (CEB) and Preston Broth (PB). Verification of positive test results was carried out by conventional culture on selective solid media. The specificities of all methods were high. The sensitivities of the EIAs were higher than that of the conventional culture technique but varied depending on the type of sample and enrichment broth. For neckskin samples, the Minividas had a significantly higher sensitivity than the EiaFoss and using PB instead of CEB as the enrichment broth significantly improved the sensitivity for both EIAs.
Conclusions: Both EIAs provided more accurate results than the conventional culture technique. Furthermore, neckskin samples enriched in PB resulted in more positive test results and Campylobacter growth than samples enriched in CEB.
Significance and impact of the study: The Eiafoss and Minividas proved to be reliable methods for detecting Campylobacter spp. in various samples. However, the results emphasize the need for the development of specific enrichment protocols for specific samples.
Similar articles
-
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types of Campylobacter spp. in Danish turkeys before and after slaughter.Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 May 1;101(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.044. Epub 2005 Jan 5. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15878407
-
Evaluation of two automated enzyme-immunoassays for detection of thermophilic campylobacters in faecal samples from cattle and swine.J Microbiol Methods. 1999 Oct;38(1-2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00080-9. J Microbiol Methods. 1999. PMID: 10520590
-
Comparison of three enrichment media for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from foods.J Appl Microbiol. 2000 Nov;89(5):884-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01203.x. J Appl Microbiol. 2000. PMID: 11119165
-
Review of current methodologies to isolate and identify Campylobacter spp. from foods.J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Oct;95(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Jul 27. J Microbiol Methods. 2013. PMID: 23899774 Review.
-
Culture-Based Standard Methods for the Isolation of Campylobacter spp. in Food and Water.Pol J Microbiol. 2024 Dec 13;73(4):433-454. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2024-046. eCollection 2024 Dec 1. Pol J Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39670639 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative, collaborative, and on-site validation of a TaqMan PCR method as a tool for certified production of fresh, campylobacter-free chickens.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Aug;72(8):5463-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00291-06. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16885299 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Nov;42(11):5125-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5125-5132.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15528705 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous