Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar 5;99(5):3182-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.052712799.

Involvement of striatal and extrastriatal DARPP-32 in biochemical and behavioral effects of fluoxetine (Prozac)

Affiliations

Involvement of striatal and extrastriatal DARPP-32 in biochemical and behavioral effects of fluoxetine (Prozac)

Per Svenningsson et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Fluoxetine (Prozac) is the most widely prescribed medication for the treatment of depression. Nevertheless, little is known about the molecular basis of its clinical efficacy, apart from the fact that fluoxetine increases the synaptic availability of serotonin. Here we show that, in vivo, fluoxetine, given either acutely or chronically, regulates the phosphorylation state of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of M(r) 32,000 (DARPP-32) at multiple sites in prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. Acute administration of fluoxetine increases phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at the protein kinase A site, Thr-34, and at the casein kinase-1 site, Ser-137, and decreases phosphorylation at the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 site, Thr-75. Each of these changes contributes, through distinct signaling pathways, to increased inhibition of protein phosphatase-1, a major serine/threonine protein phosphatase in the brain. Fluoxetine also increases phosphorylation of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor subunit GluR1 at Ser-831 and Ser-845. Both the fluoxetine-mediated increase in AMPA receptor phosphorylation at Ser-845-GluR1 and the beneficial responsiveness to fluoxetine in an animal test of antidepressant efficacy were strongly reduced in DARPP-32 knockout mice, indicating a critical role for this phosphoprotein in the antidepressant actions of fluoxetine. Mice chronically treated with fluoxetine had increased levels of DARPP-32 mRNA and protein and a decreased ability to increase phospho-Ser-137-DARPP-32 and phospho-Ser-831-GluR1. These chronic changes may be relevant to the delayed onset of therapeutic efficacy of fluoxetine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regulation of DARPP-32 phosphorylation in vivo by acute treatment with fluoxetine. Data are shown for mice treated with saline or fluoxetine (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) and killed 15-min postinjection. The amounts of (■) phospho-Thr-34–DARPP-32 and (▴) phospho-Thr-75–DARPP-32 were quantified in hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum, and the amounts of (○) phospho-Ser-137–DARPP-32 were quantified in striatum. Data represent means ± SE for six to ten mice per group. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01 compared with saline-treated mice, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regulation of DARPP-32 phosphorylation in vivo by chronic treatment with fluoxetine. Data are shown for mice treated for 19 days with saline (Upper) or fluoxetine (10 mg/kg; Lower) and then challenged with fluoxetine (0, 5, or 10 mg/kg in saline) and killed 15-min postinjection. The amounts of (■, □) phospho-Thr-34–, (▴, ▵) phospho-Thr-75– and (●, ○) phospho-Ser-137–DARPP-32 were quantified and normalized to total DARPP-32 (see text). Data represent means ± SE for four to eight mice per group. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01 compared with saline/saline-treated mice; +, P < 0.05, ++, P < 0.01 compared with fluoxetine/saline-treated mice; #, P < 0.05 compared with saline/fluoxetine-treated mice, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Levels of DARPP-32 mRNA and inhibitor-1 after chronic treatment for 19 days with saline or fluoxetine (10 mg/kg). The exposure time for the dark-field photomicrographs was 7 days, or, in the case of striatal DARPP-32 mRNA, 2 days. The amounts of DARPP-32 mRNA (Left) and inhibitor-1 mRNA (Right) were quantified by densitometry in hippocampus (Top), prefrontal cortex (Middle), and striatum (Bottom). Data represent means ± SE for four to six mice per group. *, P < 0.05 compared with saline-treated mice, Student's t test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Regulation of DARPP-32 phosphorylation by serotonin (100 μM) in vitro. The amounts of phospho-Thr-34–DARPP-32 (Upper) and phospho-Thr-75–DARPP-32 (Lower) in extracts of slices were quantified by densitometry. Data represent means ± SE for three to ten experiments. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001 compared with control, Student's t test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Regulation of AMPA receptor phosphorylation by serotonin (100 μM) in vitro. The amounts of phospho-Ser-831–GluR1 (Left) and phospho-Ser-845–GluR1 (Right) in extracts of slices from WT (black bars) and DARPP-32 KO (white bars) mice were quantified by densitometry. Data represents means ± SE for three to ten experiments. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001 compared with control; #, P < 0.05, ##, P < 0.01 compared with serotonin in WT, Student's t test.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Involvement of DARPP-32 in fluoxetine-mediated immobility in the tail-suspension test for antidepressant efficacy. WT and DARPP-32 KO mice were injected with fluoxetine (5 or 10 mg/kg) 30 min before the trial. The trial was conducted for a period of 5 min, during which the duration of immobility was recorded. Data represents means ± SE for six to ten mice per experiment. #, P < 0.05, ##, P < 0.01 compared with saline; *, P < 0.05, ***, P < 0.001 compared with fluoxetine in DARPP-32 WT mice, two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's test.

References

    1. Duman R S, Heninger G R, Nestler E J. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:597–606. - PubMed
    1. Manji H K, Drevets W C, Charney D S. Nat Med. 2001;7:541–547. - PubMed
    1. Horowski R, Sastre-Y-Hernandez M. Curr Ther Res. 1985;38:23–29.
    1. Fleischhacker W W, Hinterhuber H, Bauer H, Pflug B, Berner P, Simhandl C, Wilf R, Gerlach W, Jaklitsch H, Sastre-Y-Hernandez M, et al. Neuropsychobiology. 1992;26:59–64. - PubMed
    1. Walaas S I, Aswad D W, Greengard P. Nature (London) 1983;301:69–71. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms