Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979;57(4):625-9.

Costs and benefits of measles and mumps immunization in Austria

Costs and benefits of measles and mumps immunization in Austria

G Wiedermann et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1979.

Abstract

The usefulness of an immunization programme can be evaluated by comparing either risks and benefits or costs and benefits. By means of special formulae, the benefit-cost ratio and the benefit-cost difference can be calculated for monovalent and bivalent vaccines. An analysis of combined measles-mumps immunization in Austria showed that this measure is highly profitable economically. Since employed mothers are allowed one week's vacation each year to nurse a sick child, this affects the calculations. Including the cost of the "nursing vacation" among the benefits that would be realized following an immunization programme, the estimated benefit-cost ratio is 4.48; if the cost of the "nursing vacation" is omitted the ratio is 2.65. The estimated annual benefit-cost differences are AS 1681.90 and AS 672.85, respectively, per child. Twelve years after the beginning of a programme to immunize 100 000 1-year-old children per year (corresponding roughly to the birth rate in Austria) an amount of AS 528 million would be saved if the "nursing vacation" is included in the calculations and an amount of AS 63 million if it is not.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Immun Infekt. 1975 Feb;3(1):24-31 - PubMed
    1. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1978 Feb 15;128(3):73-6 - PubMed
    1. Fortschr Med. 1978 Feb 23;96(8):409-14 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1968 Feb 1;278(5):227-32 - PubMed
    1. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1974 Mar 16;124(11):161-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources