Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002:(1):45-9.

[The experience in the use of DNA flow cytometry to predict the natural history of malignant neoplasms]

[Article in Russian]
  • PMID: 11882972
Review

[The experience in the use of DNA flow cytometry to predict the natural history of malignant neoplasms]

[Article in Russian]
T G Nikolaeva et al. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2002.

Abstract

The aim is to study the pattern of a cell population (ploidy) and to evaluate the latter's significance in the prognosis of different carcinomas. A total of 467 patients with primary carcinomas of the breast (n = 177), lung (n = 88), head and neck (n = 140), and colon and rectum (n = 62) were examined. All the patients underwent surgery alone or in combination with radiotherapy (X-ray)/chemotherapy. A follow-up lasted 6 to 120 months. DNA was measured in the operative tumor tissue specimens by using an ICP-22 flow cytometer. Diploid and aneuploid cancers occurred in 20.4-53.6 and 43.6-79.6% of cases, respectively. The frequency of recurrences was mainly associated with aneuploidy and it was more than thrice higher than that with diploidy (21.0-43.2 versus 4.5-14.4%). Five-year survival was twice worse in patients with aneuploid tumors than in those with diploid ones. The survival rates after one operation, preoperative, and postoperative radiation therapy was greater in patients with diploid tumors than in patients with aneuploid ones. Thus, DNA-ploidy of the study neoplasms is of high informative value in predicting the course of a tumorous process and in choosing treatment policy on an individual basis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles