Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Oct;30(6 Suppl):S58-63.

[Extreme prematurity: the limits of neonatal resuscitation]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11883018
Review

[Extreme prematurity: the limits of neonatal resuscitation]

[Article in French]
U Simeoni et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Oct.

Abstract

How far providing neonatal intensive care to extremely low birth weight infants is appropriate is still a highly controversial issue. Decision making when a poor prognosis has been established may be facilitated by consensus based recommendations and rigorous procedures. In the very majority of situations, the provision of intensive care is advocated at birth a priori. A decision of treatment withholding or withdrawal may eventually be made secondarily, in the case major neurological complications, likely to induce severe long term deficits, are evidenced. In any case, an ethical policy focused on each infant's best interest is justified, while the adoption of a systematic, gestational age or birth weight based restriction of access to intensive care may not be acceptable in most countries. Rigorous criteria must be fulfilled for end of life decision making and procedures. Continuous assistance to the patient and to the parents is key determinant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources