Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573.

How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews

Affiliations

How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews

Gunther Eysenbach et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe techniques for retrieval and appraisal used by consumers when they search for health information on the internet.

Design: Qualitative study using focus groups, naturalistic observation of consumers searching the world wide web in a usability laboratory, and in-depth interviews.

Participants: A total of 21 users of the internet participated in three focus group sessions. 17 participants were given a series of health questions and observed in a usability laboratory setting while retrieving health information from the web; this was followed by in-depth interviews.

Setting: Heidelberg, Germany.

Results: Although their search technique was often suboptimal, internet users successfully found health information to answer questions in an average of 5 minutes 42 seconds (median 4 minutes 18 seconds) per question. Participants in focus groups said that when assessing the credibility of a website they primarily looked for the source, a professional design, a scientific or official touch, language, and ease of use. However, in the observational study, no participants checked any "about us" sections of websites, disclaimers, or disclosure statements. In the post-search interviews, it emerged that very few participants had noticed and remembered which websites they had retrieved information from.

Conclusions: Further observational studies are needed to design and evaluate educational and technological innovations for guiding consumers to high quality health information on the web.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Number of times participants clicked on a search result by rank order of the link as it appeared in the list of search results

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L. Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the internet. West J Med. 1999;171:302–305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pew Internet and American Life. The online health care revolution: how the web helps Americans take better care of themselves (26 Nov 2000). www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=26 (accessed 1 Nov 2001).
    1. Quintana Y, Feightner JW, Wathen CN, Sangster LM, Marshall JN. Preventive health information on the internet. Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:1759–1765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer JR, Appel RD. The Health on the Net code of conduct for medical and health websites. Comput Biol Med. 1998;28:603–610. - PubMed
    1. e-Health Ethics Initiative. e-Health code of ethics. J Med Internet Res 2000;2:e9. www.jmir.org/2000/2/e9/ (accessed 1 Nov 2001).

Publication types