Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):577-81.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577.

Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

Funda Meric  1 , Elmer V Bernstam, Nadeem Q Mirza, Kelly K Hunt, Frederick C Ames, Merrick I Ross, Henry M Kuerer, Raphael E Pollock, Mark A Musen, S Eva Singletary
Affiliations

Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

Funda Meric et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the characteristics of popular breast cancer related websites and whether more popular sites are of higher quality.

Design: The search engine Google was used to generate a list of websites about breast cancer. Google ranks search results by measures of link popularity---the number of links to a site from other sites. The top 200 sites returned in response to the query "breast cancer" were divided into "more popular" and "less popular" subgroups by three different measures of link popularity: Google rank and number of links reported independently by Google and by AltaVista (another search engine).

Main outcome measures: Type and quality of content.

Results: More popular sites according to Google rank were more likely than less popular ones to contain information on ongoing clinical trials (27% v 12%, P=0.01 ), results of trials (12% v 3%, P=0.02), and opportunities for psychosocial adjustment (48% v 23%, P<0.01). These characteristics were also associated with higher number of links as reported by Google and AltaVista. More popular sites by number of linking sites were also more likely to provide updates on other breast cancer research, information on legislation and advocacy, and a message board service. Measures of quality such as display of authorship, attribution or references, currency of information, and disclosure did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Popularity of websites is associated with type rather than quality of content. Sites that include content correlated with popularity may best meet the public's desire for information about breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Number of accurate and inaccurate websites, based on number of JAMA benchmarks met. A website was considered inaccurate if it contained one or more inaccurate statements
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, Stambaugh M, Jones H, Goldwein J, et al. Utilization of the internet by oncology patients to obtain cancer related information. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:395a. (abstract 1575).
    1. Yakren S, Shi W, Thaler H, Agre P, Bach PB, Schrag D, et al. Use of internet and other information resources among adult cancer patients and their companions. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:398a. (abstract 1589).
    1. Helft PR, Hlubocky FJ, Gordon EJ, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK. Hope and the media in advanced cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2000;19:633a. (abstract 2497).
    1. O'Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA. 2000;284:1962–1964. - PubMed
    1. Health on the Net. Survey on the evolution of internet use for health purposes: raw data for the survey February-March 2001. www.honch/Survey/FebMar2001/ (accessed 14 Jan 2002).

Publication types

MeSH terms