Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar;78(917):158-60.
doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.917.158.

Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer

Affiliations

Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer

P M Turkington et al. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Mar.

Abstract

All patients in 1997 with a histologically proved diagnosis of lung cancer in Castle Hill Hospital in whom a full set of case notes and x rays could be retrieved were studied. All previous chest x rays were reviewed by a consultant chest physician and a radiologist, who were blinded to the eventual site of the lesion and the point at which a suspicious abnormality first appeared. Case notes were inspected to clarify the cause of any error. Fifty eight patients were eligible, 28 of whom had previous chest x rays. Of these 14 were found to be abnormal. A significant difference (p=0.007) in time from diagnosis to death was found between those with a missed abnormality, median (interquartile range, IQR) 105 (55-219) days and those with no previous abnormality, median (IQR) 260 (137-512) days. In the 14 in whom the diagnosis was missed the median (IQR) delay from first abnormal chest x ray to the eventual diagnostic x ray was 101 (48-339) days. A significant difference (p=0.001) was also found between the median (IQR) time from first abnormal chest x ray to start of treatment between those with missed abnormalities, 155 (115-376) days, and those with no previous abnormality on chest x ray, 51 (44-77) days. The most common reason (47%) for the diagnosis to be missed was failure of the radiologist reporting the x ray to recognise the abnormality. It is not unusual to find previous significant radiological abnormalities in patients in whom a diagnosis of lung cancer is later made. This leads to a diagnostic delay which has a significant effect on time to initiation of treatment and palliation of symptoms, although not necessarily to eventual outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 1978 Dec;16(3):347-66 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):99-105 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):609-15 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1984 May;151(2):289-93 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1627-33 - PubMed