DNA damage and repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from normal donors and fragile X syndrome patients
- PMID: 11886710
- DOI: 10.1016/s0188-4409(01)00376-9
DNA damage and repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from normal donors and fragile X syndrome patients
Abstract
Background: Because lymphocytes from fragile X patients have been reported as hypersensitive to bleomycin-induced chromatid breaks and because the number of trinucleotide repeats in families with fragile X syndrome has a propensity to expand, we have investigated the possibility that fragile X cells may be hypersensitive to DNA damage and have a lower capacity for DNA repair.
Methods: Lymphocytes from normal and fragile X syndrome donors were immortalized by Epstein-Barr virus transformation. Characteristics of fragile X syndrome including the folate-sensitive fragile site on chromosome Xq27.3, length of CGG repeat expansion, and FMRP expression in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines were analyzed by standard cytogenetic methods, Southern blot, and Western blot, respectively. Analysis of DNA damage and repair induced by hydrogen peroxide, bleomycin, ethyl methanesulfonate, 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide, etoposide, and mitomycin C was carried out by single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (known as comet assay).
Results: Lymphoblastoid cell lines from fragile X donors had a folate-sensitive fragile site on chromosome Xq27.3, no or low FMRP expression, and expansion of the CGG repeat. Results of comet assay showed that fragile X cells were not more sensitive to mutagen-induced DNA strand breaks and did not have lower DNA repair capacity in comparison with normal cells. Furthermore, one fragile X cell line showed hyposensitivity to DNA strand breaks induced by hydrogen peroxide, bleomycin, and ethyl methansulfonate.
Conclusions: The results of this study do not support the notion that CGG trinucleotide expansion in fragile X syndrome is caused by permanent deficiency in DNA repair.
Similar articles
-
Molecular and cytogenetic investigations of the fragile X region including the Frax A and Frax E CGG trinucleotide repeat sequences in families multiplex for autism and related phenotypes.Hum Hered. 1997 Sep-Oct;47(5):254-62. doi: 10.1159/000154421. Hum Hered. 1997. PMID: 9358013
-
Epstein-Barr virus transformation of human lymphoblastoid cells from patients with fragile X syndrome induces variable changes on CGG repeats size and promoter methylation.Mol Diagn. 2003;7(3-4):163-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03260033. Mol Diagn. 2003. PMID: 15068386
-
Reduced FMR1 mRNA translation efficiency in fragile X patients with premutations.RNA. 2002 Dec;8(12):1482-8. RNA. 2002. PMID: 12515381 Free PMC article.
-
The fragile X syndrome.J Med Genet. 1998 Jul;35(7):579-89. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.7.579. J Med Genet. 1998. PMID: 9678703 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fragile X syndrome.Curr Opin Neurol. 1997 Apr;10(2):142-7. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199704000-00012. Curr Opin Neurol. 1997. PMID: 9146995 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of Xq27.3 Fragility Using the Micronucleus-Fluorescence In situ Hybridization Assay.Genome Integr. 2020 Aug 13;11:1. doi: 10.4103/genint.genint_4_20. eCollection 2020. Genome Integr. 2020. PMID: 33110486 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical