The economic impacts of the tobacco settlement
- PMID: 11887906
- DOI: 10.1002/pam.1037
The economic impacts of the tobacco settlement
Abstract
Recent litigation against the major tobacco companies culminated in a master settlement agreement (MSA) under which the participating companies agreed to compensate most states for Medicaid expenses. Here the terms of the settlement are outlined and its economic implications analyzed using data from Massachusetts. The financial compensation to Massachusetts (and other states) under the MSA is substantial. However, this compensation is dwarfed by the value of the health impacts induced by the settlement. Specifically, Medicaid spending will fall, but only by a modest amount. More importantly, the value of health benefits ($65 billion through 2025 in 1999 dollars) from increased longevity is an order of magnitude greater than any other impacts or payments. The net efficiency implications of the settlement turn mainly on a comparison of the value of these health benefits relative to a valuation of the foregone pleasure of smoking. To the extent that the value of the health benefits is not offset by the value of the pleasure foregone, the economic impacts of the MSA will include a share of these health benefits.
Similar articles
-
Impacts of the Master Settlement Agreement on the tobacco industry.Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13(4):356-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007229. Tob Control. 2004. PMID: 15564618 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing excise taxes on cigarettes in California: a dynamic simulation of health and economic impacts.Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.024. Epub 2005 Jan 7. Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 15917022
-
How did the Master Settlement Agreement change tobacco industry expenditures for cigarette advertising and promotions?Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):84S-90S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264600. Health Promot Pract. 2004. PMID: 15231101
-
The human costs of tobacco use (2).N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 7;330(14):975-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199404073301406. N Engl J Med. 1994. PMID: 8121461 Review. No abstract available.
-
Reducing the burden of smoking world-wide: effectiveness of interventions and their coverage.Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Nov;25(6):597-609. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944511. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006. PMID: 17132576 Review.
Cited by
-
The social costs of uranium mining in the US Colorado Plateau cohort, 1960-2005.Int J Public Health. 2017 May;62(4):471-478. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0943-z. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Int J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28251247
-
What are the health costs of uranium mining? A case study of miners in Grants, New Mexico.Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014 Oct;20(4):289-300. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000077. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014. PMID: 25224806 Free PMC article.
-
Funding of North Carolina tobacco control programs through the Master Settlement Agreement.Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):36-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.070466. Epub 2006 Nov 30. Am J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17138928 Free PMC article.
-
When health policy and empirical evidence collide: the case of cigarette package warning labels and economic consumer surplus.Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e42-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301737. Epub 2013 Dec 12. Am J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24328661 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational disease and workers' compensation: coverage, costs, and consequences.Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):689-721. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00328.x. Milbank Q. 2004. PMID: 15595947 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical