Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001;18(12):899-911.
doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118120-00002.

Strategies for management of prostate cancer-related bone pain

Affiliations
Review

Strategies for management of prostate cancer-related bone pain

R C Pelger et al. Drugs Aging. 2001.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related death in men worldwide. In the majority of cases, prostate cancer metastases to the skeleton, in which case cancer-related bone pain becomes a major cause of morbidity. Androgen ablation is the treatment of choice for securing regression of skeletal metastases in the majority of cases. Intermittent androgen ablation is an attractive alternative, aimed at minimising adverse effects of hormone deprivation but also potentially delaying hormone-refractoriness. The development of hormone-refractoriness is heralded by a significant increase in morbidity largely because of escalating bone pain caused by the progression of the metastatic process. Skillful use of analgesics is initially successful but eventually fails to control symptoms. Localised metastases are best treated with local radiotherapy that is rapidly effective. Over the last few years, it has become clear that therapeutic modalities using bone-seeking radionuclides or bisphosphonates have been effective in the palliation of prostate cancer-related bone pain, although not affecting survival. The main limiting factor with the use of radionuclides is bone marrow suppression, also a feature of the very late stages of prostate cancer. Bisphosphonates do not carry this disadvantage. Results of large double-blind, placebo-controlled studies should be awaited, however, before advocating the widespread use of these agents in the management of patients with prostate cancer and skeletal metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Urol. 1985 Dec;57(6):721-3 - PubMed
    1. Endocrinology. 1999 Oct;140(10):4451-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1980 Feb 7;302(6):310-5 - PubMed
    1. Nucl Med Commun. 1999 Jul;20(7):609-15 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):2024-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources