Assessing methodological quality of clinical trials in sepsis: searching for the right tool
- PMID: 11889339
- DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00040
Assessing methodological quality of clinical trials in sepsis: searching for the right tool
Comment on
-
Randomized, controlled clinical trials in sepsis: has methodological quality improved over time?Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb;30(2):461-72. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00032. Crit Care Med. 2002. PMID: 11889331 Review.
Similar articles
-
Randomized, controlled clinical trials in sepsis: has methodological quality improved over time?Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb;30(2):461-72. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00032. Crit Care Med. 2002. PMID: 11889331 Review.
-
The randomized controlled trial: basic considerations.Clin Nurse Spec. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):62-4. doi: 10.1097/00002800-200603000-00004. Clin Nurse Spec. 2006. PMID: 16609277 Review. No abstract available.
-
Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions has improved over time.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;64(6):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Dec 8. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21144705 Review.
-
Randomized phase II trials: misleading and unreliable.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):e649-50; author reply e651-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3254. Epub 2010 Sep 20. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20855829 No abstract available.
-
Methodological and ethical quality in phase III--breast cancer trials.Med Law. 2009 Dec;28(4):637-48. Med Law. 2009. PMID: 20157975
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical