A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer: the prognostic value of false-positive results
- PMID: 11890239
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x
A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer: the prognostic value of false-positive results
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) and bladder tumour antigen (BTAstat) tests compared with voided urinary cytology (VUC) in detecting and following bladder cancer, assessing particularly the prognostic value of false-positive test results in patients followed up for bladder cancer.
Patients and methods: From 739 patients suspected of having bladder cancer, voided urine samples for the NMP22 and BTAstat tests, and for VUC and urine analysis, were collected before cystoscopy. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder lesions or mapping. and were followed for a mean (range) of 27.3 (3-65) months.
Results: In the 406 patients with bladder cancer, the overall sensitivity was 85% for NMP22, 70% for BTAstat and 62% for VUC. For histological grades 1-3 the sensitivity in detecting transitional cell carcinoma was 82%, 89% and 94% for NMP22, 53%, 76% and 90% for BTAstat, and 38%, 68% and 90% for VUC, respectively. Although the sensitivity in detecting invasive carcinoma was >85% for all the tests. NMP22 and BTAstat were statistically more sensitive than VUC for superficial tumours. The optimal threshold value for NMP22, calculated using the receiver operating characteristics curve was 8.25 U/mL. The specificity was 68% for NMP22, 67% for BTAstat, and 96% for VUC. The specificity of VUC remained >87% and was independent of benign histological findings. In contrast, in patients with no apparent genitourinary disease on histology, NMP22 and BTAstat had significantly higher specificity (94% and 92%, respectively: P=0.003) than in the group with chronic cystitis (52% for both tests). Forty patients having no bladder cancer at biopsy had a recurrence after a mean (range) follow-up of 7.7 (3-15) months: all had a previous history of bladder cancer. According to subsequent recurrence, the prognostic positive and negative predictive values were 18% and 91% for NMP22, 13% and 88% for BTAstat, and 79% and 91% for VUC. Both false-positive VUC and NMP22 tests predicted recurrence (log-rank test, P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively), but the BTAstat test produced no similar correlation (P=0.778).
Conclusion: The NMP22 and BTAstat tests are better than VUC for detecting superficial and low-grade bladder cancer but they have significantly lower specificity. After excluding diseases with the potential to interfere in these tests the overall specificity of both tests is increased considerably. False-positive results from NMP22 and VUC but not from BTAstat in patients followed up for bladder cancer correlate with future recurrences.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of the BTAstat test, NMP22, and voided urine cytology in the detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumors.Urology. 2000 Jun;55(6):871-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00489-1. Urology. 2000. PMID: 10840098
-
[Non-invasive urine tests in diagnosis and as prognostic markers for urinary bladder carcinoma. Comparison of the BTAstat and NMP 22 tests with immunocytology using monoclonal antibodies against Lewis X and 486p3/12].Urologe A. 2003 Apr;42(4):523-30. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0247-6. Epub 2003 Jan 17. Urologe A. 2003. PMID: 12715124 German.
-
A study comparing various noninvasive methods of detecting bladder cancer in urine.BJU Int. 2002 Mar;89(4):369-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01699.x. BJU Int. 2002. PMID: 11872026
-
Non-invasive diagnostic tests for bladder cancer: a review of the literature.Urol Int. 2005;75(3):193-200. doi: 10.1159/000087792. Urol Int. 2005. PMID: 16215303 Review.
-
Urine cytology. It is still the gold standard for screening?Urol Clin North Am. 2000 Feb;27(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70231-7. Urol Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10696242 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Oct 17;19(12):96. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0857-1. Curr Urol Rep. 2018. PMID: 30328534 Review.
-
Possible disease remission in patient with invasive bladder cancer with D-fraction regimen.Int J Gen Med. 2009 Jul 30;2:15-7. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s4948. Int J Gen Med. 2009. PMID: 20360882 Free PMC article.
-
Bladder tumour antigen (BTA stat) test compared to the urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A meta-analysis.Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 May;8(5-6):E347-52. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1668. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014. PMID: 24940462 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary Biomarkers in the Evaluation of Primary Hematuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bladder Cancer. 2018 Oct 29;4(4):353-363. doi: 10.3233/BLC-180179. Bladder Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30417046 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic performance of nuclear matrix protein 22 and urine cytology for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis.Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Jun;50(6):300-312. doi: 10.1002/dc.24954. Epub 2022 Mar 24. Diagn Cytopathol. 2022. PMID: 35322590 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous