Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification
- PMID: 11890334
Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification
Abstract
The 5th edition of TNM classification (1997) grades lymph node involvement in gastric cancer by the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Their prognostic significance as defined by the new (5th edn., 1997) and old (4th edn., 1987) TNM classification was evaluated and survival in pN categories between both versions was compared. It was demonstrated in our analysis that comparison of old and new TNM systems is possible. Categories pN1 and pN2 contain patients selected by different criteria in both versions of TNM classification but with similar survival probabilities. Anatomic location of lymph nodes as described in the 4th edn. and number of involved nodes in the 5th edn. of TNM classification have about the same prognostic value in categories pN1 and pN2. The advantage of the 5th edn. is the identification of a group of patients (pN3, >15 involved lymph nodes) with significantly poor prognosis, which, in our series, includes 15% of R0 resected patients with lymph node metastases.
Similar articles
-
Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):359-66. Am Surg. 2007. PMID: 17439029 Review.
-
Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):685-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01115.x. Br J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10361195
-
Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.Cancer. 2000 Apr 15;88(8):1796-800. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10760754
-
Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.ANZ J Surg. 2004 Oct;74(10):852-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03188.x. ANZ J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15456431
-
Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.Am Surg. 2006 Feb;72(2):118-23. Am Surg. 2006. PMID: 16536239 Review.
Cited by
-
Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211836. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30721261 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3967-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3967. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24744586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Old and new TNM in carcinoma of the gastric antrum: analysis of our personal experience.J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Nov;7(7):912-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-003-0039-3. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003. PMID: 14592667
-
Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of patients with surgically-removed gastric carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):182-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.182. World J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 14716818 Free PMC article.
-
Posttherapy topographical nodal status, ypN-site, predicts survival of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgical resection for non-type 4 locally advanced gastric cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG1004-A.Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01098-w. Epub 2020 Jun 22. Gastric Cancer. 2021. PMID: 32572792
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous