A comparison between forefoot plaster and wooden soled shoes following Mitchell's osteotomy for hallux valgus

Abstract

Between 1 October 1997 and 1 November 1998, 43 patients (59 feet) were treated with a standard Mitchell's osteotomy for hallux valgus. Of these, 26 patients (36 feet) were treated postoperatively in a forefoot plaster. The other 17 patients (23 feet) were treated with a wooden soled shoe. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for age, indication for surgery, pre-operative deformity or grade of the operating surgeon. There was no significant difference in the mean time immobilised, mean time to union or complications. The patients were interviewed by telephone after a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. There was no significant difference in results between the 2 groups. This suggests that a forefoot plaster following Mitchell's osteotomy is unnecessary. Postoperative mobilisation in a wooden soled shoe can be used as an alternative.