Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jan;19(1):39-41.
doi: 10.1023/a:1014062723606.

A prospective novel method of determining ovarian size during in vitro fertilization cycles

Affiliations

A prospective novel method of determining ovarian size during in vitro fertilization cycles

John L Frattarelli et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Recently ovarian volume has been touted as a means to evaluate ovarian reserve in assisted reproductive technology cycles. In this study, a novel method of determining ovarian size was evaluated and compared to the standard three-dimensional ovarian volume measurement during in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods: This prospective observational study consisted of 60 consecutive patients undergoing baseline transvaginal ultrasonography for IVF from July to August, 1999. The main outcome measures were mean ovarian size and mean ovarian volume.

Results: The patients' ages ranged from 23 to 43 years with a mean age of 33.86 +/- 4.5 years. The mean ovarian size was 2.19 +/- 0.4 cm (range 1.40-3.40). The mean ovarian volume was 5.02 +/- 2.7 cm3 (range 1.71-16.5 cm3). By linear regression there was a 90% correlation between the two methods of ovarian measurement (r = 0.90, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: These results demonstrated a strong correlation between these two methods of determining ovarian size. Mean ovarian diameter measured in the largest sagittal plane is a good estimation of ovarian volume and may be used to quickly assess ovarian status prior to undergoing IVF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Padilla SL, Garcia JE. Effect of maternal age and number of in vitro fertilization procedures on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:270–273. - PubMed
    1. Scott RT, Hofmann GE. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1–11. - PubMed
    1. Syrop CH, Willhoite A, Van Voorhis BJ. Ovarian volume: A novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:1167–1171. - PubMed
    1. Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:294–297. - PubMed
    1. Higgins RV, Van Nagell JR, Woods CH, Thompson EA, Kryscio RJ. Interobserver variation in ovarian measurements using transvaginal sonography. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;39:69–71. - PubMed