Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr;70(4):2022-8.
doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.2022-2028.2002.

Mucosal or parenteral administration of microsphere-associated Bacillus anthracis protective antigen protects against anthrax infection in mice

Affiliations

Mucosal or parenteral administration of microsphere-associated Bacillus anthracis protective antigen protects against anthrax infection in mice

Helen C Flick-Smith et al. Infect Immun. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Existing licensed anthrax vaccines are administered parenterally and require multiple doses to induce protective immunity. This requires trained personnel and is not the optimum route for stimulating a mucosal immune response. Microencapsulation of vaccine antigens offers a number of advantages over traditional vaccine formulations, including stability without refrigeration and the potential for utilizing less invasive routes of administration. Recombinant protective antigen (rPA), the dominant antigen for protection against anthrax infection, was encapsulated in poly-L-lactide 100-kDa microspheres. Alternatively, rPA was loosely attached to the surfaces of microspheres by lyophilization. All of the microspheric formulations were administered to A/J mice with a two-dose schedule by either the intramuscular route, the intranasal route, or a combination of these two routes, and immunogenicity and protective efficacy were assessed. An intramuscular priming immunization followed by either an intramuscular or intranasal boost gave optimum anti-rPA immunoglobulin G titers. Despite differences in rPA-specific antibody titers, all immunized mice survived an injected challenge consisting of 10(3) median lethal doses of Bacillus anthracis STI spores. Immunization with microencapsulated and microsphere-associated formulations of rPA also protected against aerosol challenge with 30 median lethal doses of STI spores. These results show that rPA can be encapsulated and surface bound to polymeric microspheres without impairing its immunogenicity and also that mucosal or parenteral administration of microspheric formulations of rPA efficiently protects mice against both injected and aerosol challenges with B. anthracis spores. Microspheric formulations of rPA could represent the next generation of anthrax vaccines, which could require fewer doses because they are more potent, are less reactogenic than currently available human anthrax vaccines, and could be self-administered without injection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Morphology of rPA-containing PLLA microspheres, as viewed by scanning electron microscopy.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Anti-rPA IgG concentrations (means ± standard errors of the means; n = 5 for formulations 2 and 4; n = 6 for formulations 2a and 4a) for A/J mice immunized with sufficient formulation 2, 4, 2a, or 4a to deliver a 10-μg dose of rPA by either the i.m. route or the i.n. route on days 1 and 21 of the immunization regimen. Samples were taken 28 days after the primary immunization.

References

    1. Beedham, R. J. 1999. M. Phil. thesis. The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
    1. Eyles, J. E., I. D. Spiers., E. D. Williamson, and H. O. Alpar. 1998. Analysis of local and systemic immunological responses after intra-tracheal, intra-nasal and intra-muscular administration of microsphere co-encapsulated Yersinia pestis sub-unit vaccines. Vaccine 16:2000-2009. - PubMed
    1. Eyles, J. E., E. D. Williamson, I. D. Spiers, and H. O. Alpar. 2000. Protection studies following bronchopulmonary and intramuscular immunisation with Yersinia pestis F1 and V subunit vaccines coencapsulated in biodegradable microspheres: a comparison of efficacy. Vaccine 18:3266-3271. - PubMed
    1. Fellows, P. F., M. K. Linscott, B. E. Ivins, M. L. M. Pitt, C. A. Rossi, P. H. Gibbs, and A. M. Friedlander. 2001. Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Vaccine 19:3241-3247. - PubMed
    1. Friedlander, A. M., P. R. Pittman, and G. W. Parker. 1999. Anthrax vaccine: evidence for safety and efficacy against inhalational anthrax. JAMA 282:2104-2106. - PubMed