Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer
- PMID: 11896100
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1519
Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.
Patients and methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point.
Results: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients.
Conclusion: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(15):2894-901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2894. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10920138 Clinical Trial.
-
Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 1;20(17):3605-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.123. J Clin Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12202661 Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter phase II study of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil with or without leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Ann Oncol. 2000 Apr;11(4):415-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1008356522080. Ann Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10847459 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of GERCOD trials of bimonthly leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil 48-h continuous infusion in advanced colorectal cancer: evolution of a regimen. Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Cancers de l'Ovaire et Digestifs (GERCOD).Eur J Cancer. 1998 Apr;34(5):619-26. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00364-x. Eur J Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9713264 Review.
-
A comprehensive review of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Cancer. 1997 Oct 1;80(7):1179-87. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971001)80:7<1179::aid-cncr1>3.0.co;2-g. Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9317168 Review.
Cited by
-
Oral drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Apr 29;13:17588359211009001. doi: 10.1177/17588359211009001. eCollection 2021. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33995592 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Looking for the right drug for the right patient: a tale of old drugs and new pathways.Clin Transl Oncol. 2005 Oct;7(9):375-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02716582. Clin Transl Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16238971 No abstract available.
-
Oral versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines for colorectal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD008398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008398.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28752564 Free PMC article.
-
Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Jun;52(6):399-414. doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0040-2. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013. PMID: 23420518 Review.
-
First-line therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: integrating clinical benefit with the costs of drugs.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1505-1516. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3158-8. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 30196427 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical