Comparative pharmacokinetic study of continuous venous infusion fluorouracil and oral fluorouracil with eniluracil in patients with advanced solid tumors
- PMID: 11896120
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1683
Comparative pharmacokinetic study of continuous venous infusion fluorouracil and oral fluorouracil with eniluracil in patients with advanced solid tumors
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetics of continuous venous infusion (CVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of oral eniluracil/5-FU and to describe toxicities and clinical activity of prolonged oral administration of eniluracil/5-FU.
Patients and methods: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study compared CVI 5-FU to an oral 5-FU/eniluracil combination. Seventeen patients (arm A) were randomly assigned to receive eniluracil/5-FU combination tablets (10:1 mg/m(2) BID for 7 days) during the first study period, followed by 5-FU (300 mg/m(2) CVI for 7 days) during period 2, with a 14-day washout between periods. Sixteen patients (arm B) received treatment in the opposite sequence. In period 3, all patients received eniluracil/5-FU tablets BID for 28 days. Plasma levels of 5-FU during CVI and oral administration were analyzed in periods 1 and 2. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity was determined by measuring plasma uracil, urinary alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine, and peripheral-blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity.
Results: There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities in either arm. Partial responses were observed in three patients. Another three patients had stable disease for > or = 3 months. Eniluracil and 5-FU pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous studies and were unaffected by administration sequence. The mean +/- SD steady-state plasma concentration (C(P)) and area under the curve (AUC)(144-168h) for CVI 5-FU (104 +/- 45 ng/mL and 2,350 +/- 826 ng x h/mL, respectively) were three-fold greater than those for oral 5-FU (38.1 +/- 7.7 ng/mL and 722 +/- 182 ng x h/mL, respectively [P <.00001]). Individual 5-FU concentrations during CVI were highly variable, whereas those after eniluracil/5-FU were very reproducible. DPD activity in PBMCs before each study period was normal.
Conclusion: Both CVI 5-FU and oral eniluracil/5-FU were well tolerated, with moderate activity in these heavily pretreated patients. However, 5-FU steady-state C(P) and AUCs achieved with oral eniluracil/5-FU were significantly less than with CVI 5-FU.
Similar articles
-
Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Dec 1;18(23):3952-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.23.3952. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11099325 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):915-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.915. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10673535 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a combined oral formulation of eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.Ann Oncol. 2000 Oct;11(10):1313-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1008379802642. Ann Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11106122 Clinical Trial.
-
Eniluracil: an irreversible inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000 Jul;9(7):1635-49. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.7.1635. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11060767 Review.
-
Clinical development of eniluracil: current status.Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Oct;12(10 Suppl 7):52-6. Oncology (Williston Park). 1998. PMID: 9830627 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship between 5-fluorouracil exposure and outcome in patients receiving continuous venous infusion with or without concomitant radiotherapy.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;64(5):613-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02951.x. Epub 2007 Jun 19. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17578483 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses of 5-Fluorouracil in East-Asian Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 Oct;55(10):1205-1216. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0395-2. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016. PMID: 27138786 Clinical Trial.
-
Modeling the 5-fluorouracil area under the curve versus dose relationship to develop a pharmacokinetic dosing algorithm for colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFOX6.Oncologist. 2012;17(3):296-302. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0357. Epub 2012 Mar 1. Oncologist. 2012. PMID: 22382460 Free PMC article.
-
Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan;39(1):2-15. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn127. Epub 2008 Dec 3. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19052037 Free PMC article.
-
5-Fluorouracil response in a large panel of colorectal cancer cell lines is associated with mismatch repair deficiency.Br J Cancer. 2010 Jul 27;103(3):340-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605780. Epub 2010 Jul 6. Br J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20606684 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous