Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002:3:3.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-3-3. Epub 2002 Feb 19.

Longitudinal impact of a youth tobacco education program

Affiliations

Longitudinal impact of a youth tobacco education program

Martin C Mahoney et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2002.

Abstract

Background: Information on the effectiveness of elementary school level, tobacco-use prevention programs is generally limited. This study assessed the impact of a structured, one-time intervention that was designed to modify attitudes and knowledge about tobacco. Participants were fifth-grade students from schools in western New York State.

Methods: Twenty-eight schools, which were in relatively close geographic proximity, were randomized into three groups; Group 1 was used to assess whether attitudes/knowledge were changed in the hypothesized direction by the intervention, and if those changes were retained four months later. Groups 2 and 3, were used as comparison groups to assess possible test-retest bias and historical effects. Groups 1 and 3 were pooled to assess whether attitudes/knowledge were changed by the intervention as measured by an immediate post-test. The non-parametric analytical techniques of Wilcoxon-Matched Pairs/Sign Ranks and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Rank Sums Tests were used to compare proportions of correct responses at each of the schools.

Results: Pooled analyses showed that short-term retention on most items was achieved. It was also found that retention on two knowledge items 'recognition that smokers have yellow teeth and fingers' and 'smoking one pack of cigarettes a day costs several hundred dollars per year' was maintained for four months.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that inexpensive, one-time interventions for tobacco-use prevention can be of value. Changes in attitudes and knowledge conducive to the goal of tobacco-use prevention can be achieved for short-term retention and some relevant knowledge items can be retained for several months.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of Tar Wars Evaluation: Western New York State, 1998–1999

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giovino GA. Epidemiology of tobacco use among US adolescents. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 1999;1:S31–S40. - PubMed
    1. CDC Youth Tobacco Surveillance – United States, 2000. MMWR. 1992;50:1–84. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Sussman S, Biglan A. The Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: A Lesson on Inaccurate Media Coverage and the Importance of Prevention Advocacy (Editorial). Prev Science, 2001;2:67–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1011500829657. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tobler NS. Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: results of the 1993 meta-analysis. NIDA Res Monograph, 1997;170:5–68. - PubMed
    1. Black DR, Tobler NS, Sciacca JP. Peer-helping/involvement: an efficacious way to meet the challenge of reducing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth? J School Health, 1998;68:87–93. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources