Postdischarge surveillance after cesarean section
- PMID: 11903215
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00264.x
Postdischarge surveillance after cesarean section
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section is a major surgical procedure with a relatively short hospital stay. A significant rate of surgical site infection after this procedure is missed by standard inpatient surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate a method of postdischarge surveillance and compare results with the incidence of infection before discharge.
Method: A postdischarge survey was sent on day 30 to 277 women who had delivered by cesarean section during the 12-month study period. A follow-up telephone interview was conducted if the questionnaire had not been returned within 2 weeks, if a diagnosis of infection could not be clearly determined from the participant's responses, or to confirm the diagnosis of infection. If follow-up was not completed, a chart audit was undertaken.
Results: A total response rate of 89 percent (247/277) was obtained, and 28 women with a surgical site infection were identified from the survey. Telephone follow-up and chart review of patients with possible infection and of nonresponders identified 32 percent more postdischarge infections (14/42). The overall infection rate was 17 percent compared with 2.8 percent at discharge.
Conclusions: Postdischarge surveillance is necessary to determine accurate surgical site infection rates after cesarean section, increase awareness of caregivers about infection control problems, and indicate the need for appropriate follow-up care. Women undergoing a cesarean delivery should be informed of the risk of postdischarge infection and educated about the signs and symptoms of infection.
Similar articles
-
Postdischarge surveillance of surgical site infections: a multi-method approach to data collection.Am J Infect Control. 2002 Nov;30(7):417-24. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.123393. Am J Infect Control. 2002. PMID: 12410219
-
Postdischarge surveillance following delivery: the incidence of infections and associated factors.Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jun;41(6):549-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Am J Infect Control. 2013. PMID: 23219668
-
Effect of postdischarge surveillance on rates of infectious complications after cesarean section.Am J Infect Control. 1992 Aug;20(4):198-201. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80146-4. Am J Infect Control. 1992. PMID: 1326238
-
Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):227-31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00047-2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998. PMID: 9688482
-
Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary.Am J Infect Control. 1992 Aug;20(4):206-13. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80148-8. Am J Infect Control. 1992. PMID: 1524269 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of electrocautery for coagulation and wound complications in Caesarean sections.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:602375. doi: 10.1155/2014/602375. Epub 2014 Jul 20. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 25143985 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1180-1189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13361. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32960242 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section.BJOG. 2011 Jan;118(2):193-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02729.x. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21159119 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(1):CD003858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003858.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 14974041 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical