Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975;3(3):257-67.
doi: 10.1007/BF02220739.

Exposure of apple thinners to parathion residues

Exposure of apple thinners to parathion residues

H R Wolfe et al. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1975.

Abstract

In studies of potential exposure of a volunteer working under controlled conditions during apple hand-thinning operations at 1, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168, and 240 hr after application of conventional 0.03% parathion spray, both dermal and respiratory exposure values were greater where water-wettable powder formulations were used than where emulsifiables were used. Residue levels of parathion on leaves from the two types of applications were about the same. Only trace amounts of paraoxon could be detected at one and seven days after application. Highest exposure values (14.2 mg/hr dermally and 0.15 mg/hr respiratorily) were obtained within 24 hr of application. Exposure was considerably less after residues were 72 hr old. Greatest exposure was on the forearms and hands. Urinary p-nitrophenol excretion indicated slightly more absorption following exposure in water-wettable powder experimental plots. Potential exposure values indicate that absorption could reach hazardous levels after one or two hr of work, even at the 96-hr residue period, if all the pesticide were absorbed. Considering that only a small fraction of the total amount would be absorbed, it is calculated that at 75-hr residue period poisoning should not occur. There was no significant change in blood cholinesterase activity of the volunteer worker. Variation in spray deposit within an orchard due to poor tank mixing did not appear to be great enough to be considered an important factor affecting exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Environ Health. 1966 Sep;13(3):340-4 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1962;26:75-91 - PubMed
    1. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1964 Jul;2:311-6 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:279-81 - PubMed
    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1958 Feb 15;166(7):740-6 - PubMed