Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Guideline
. 2002:2:4.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-4. Epub 2002 Feb 28.

Markers for early detection of cancer: statistical guidelines for nested case-control studies

Affiliations
Guideline

Markers for early detection of cancer: statistical guidelines for nested case-control studies

Stuart G Baker et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002.

Abstract

Background: Recently many long-term prospective studies have involved serial collection and storage of blood or tissue specimens. This has spurred nested case-control studies that involve testing some specimens for various markers that might predict cancer. Until now there has been little guidance in statistical design and analysis of these studies.

Methods: To develop statistical guidelines, we considered the purpose, the types of biases, and the opportunities for extracting additional information.

Results: The following guidelines: (1) For the clearest interpretation, statistics should be based on false and true positive rates - not odds ratios or relative risks (2) To avoid overdiagnosis bias, cases should be diagnosed as a result of symptoms rather than on screening. (3) To minimize selection bias, the spectrum of control conditions should be the same in study and target screening populations. (4) To extract additional information, criteria for a positive test should be based on combinations of individual markers and changes in marker levels over time. (5) To avoid overfitting, the criteria for a positive marker combination developed in a training sample should be evaluated in a random test sample from the same study and, if possible, a validation sample from another study. (6) To identify biomarkers with true and false positive rates similar to mammography, the training, test, and validation samples should each include at least 110 randomly selected subjects without cancer and 70 subjects with cancer.

Conclusion: These guidelines ensure good practice in the design and analysis of nested case-control studies of early detection biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve derived from hypothetical data in Table 2. Because acceptable cancer screening requires a very small false positive rate (FPR) and a reasonable true positive rate (TPR), only the four points farthest to the left are relevant for biomarker evaluation.

References

    1. Xu Y, Shen ZZ, Wiper DW, Wu MZ, Morton RE, Elson P, Kennedy AW, Belinson J, Markman M, Casey G. Lysophosphatidic acid as a potential biomarker for ovarian and other gynecologic cancers. JAMA. 1998;280:719–723. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.8.719. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Signorello LB, Brismar K, Bergstrom R, Andersson SO, Wolk A, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91:1965. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.22.1965. - DOI - PubMed
    1. You WC, Blot WJ, Zhang L, Kneller RW, Li JY, Jin ML, Chang YS, Zeng XR, Zhao L, Fraumeni JF, Xu GW, Samloff MI. Serum pepsinogens in relation to precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk for gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention. 1993;2:113–117. - PubMed
    1. Nam RK, Diamandis EP, Toi A, Trachtenberg J, Magklara A, Scorilas A, Papnastasiou PA, Jewett MAS, Narod SA. Serum human glandular kallikrein-2 protease levels predict the presence of prostate cancer among men with elevated prostate specific antigen. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18:1036–1042. - PubMed
    1. Langholz B. Case-control study, nested. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editor. In The Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1998. pp. 514–519.

Publication types