The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group
- PMID: 11916002
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00260.x
The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group
Abstract
In light of evolving pacemaker technology and increasing interest in multisite pacing, the Committee on the Development of Position Statements (CDPS) of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) created an ad hoc Pacemaker Mode Code Task Force in April 2001 under the chairmanship of David L. Hayes, MD, for the purpose of bringing the NASPE/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group (BPEG) Generic Pacemaker Code (NBG Code) up to date. The task force, whose members are the authors of this article, designed a revised NBG Code in which three major issues were taken into account. First, it was recognized that all modern pacemakerpulse generators are capable of extensive bidirectional communication with an external programming device, making them "communicating" pulse generators as defined by the current (1987) NBG Code. Second, it was decided that a means of providing basic information regarding the location of multisite pacing would be a useful ingredient of the NBG Code. Third, in view of the extensive antibradycardia pacing capabilities common in modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators and the availability of the NASPE/BPEG Defibrillator Code (NBD Code), it was considered unnecessary for the NBG Code to address the presence or absence of antitachycardia features. The resulting updated version of the NBG Code as described herein was endorsed by the BPEG on September 20, 2001 and adopted by the NASPE Board of Trustees on October 18, 2001. The structure of the revised NBG Code differs from that of the previous version in two respects alone: Position IV specifies only the presence or absence of rate modulation, and Position V specifies only the location or absence of multisite pacing (i.e., biatrial or biventricular pacing with at least two stimulation sites in each case) more than one stimulation site in any single cardiac chamber, or any combination of these. The revised NBG Code is deliberately configured to avoid confusion with earlier mode codes, and it is the authors' hope that it will serve as an enhanced resource for communication among those engaged in every phase of the multidisciplinary practice of cardiac rhythm management.
Similar articles
-
North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology policy statement. The NASPE/BPEG defibrillator code.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Sep;16(9):1776-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01809.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993. PMID: 7692407
-
The NASPE/BPEG generic pacemaker code for antibradyarrhythmia and adaptive-rate pacing and antitachyarrhythmia devices.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Jul;10(4 Pt 1):794-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb06035.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987. PMID: 2441363
-
Report of the NASPE Mode Code Committee.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984 May;7(3 Pt 1):395-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb04924.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984. PMID: 6204293
-
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in cardiovascular practice: report of the Policy Conference of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. NASPE Policy Conference Committee.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Jun;14(6):969-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04143.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991. PMID: 1715071 Review. No abstract available.
-
Report of the NASPE Policy Conference training requirements for permanent pacemaker selection, implantation, and follow-up. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Jan;17(1):6-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01343.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994. PMID: 7511233 Review.
Cited by
-
Complications related to pacemakers and other cardiac implantable electronic devices: essentials for internists and emergency physicians.Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;18(3):851-862. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03227-6. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Intern Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36892799 Review.
-
Post operative temporary epicardial pacing: When, how and why?Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Jul;1(2):120-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.43877. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 20300253 Free PMC article.
-
Contemplating the Need to Advance Cardiac Device Algorithms.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Oct 15;10(10):3853-3857. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.101003. eCollection 2019 Oct. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019. PMID: 32494406 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The weakest point of cardiac resynchronization therapy: new technologies facing old terminology.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 10;10:1236369. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1236369. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37636299 Free PMC article.
-
[Who dictates the rhythm which must be followed? : Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in anesthesiology].Anaesthesist. 2011 Aug;60(8):775-88. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1906-z. Anaesthesist. 2011. PMID: 21833755 Review. German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous