Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements
- PMID: 1192079
- PMCID: PMC1675244
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.4.5993.376
Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements
Abstract
Sensitivity to chromium, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, vanadium, and titanium was studied by patch tests in 50 patients who had received total joint replacements. Nineteen (38%) were sensitive to one or more of the metals. In 23 patients non-traumatic failure of the prosthesis had occurred, and 15 of these patients were sensitive to metal. Out of 27 patients with no evidence of prosthesis loosening, four were sensitive to nickel and cobalt or nickel only. Dermatological reactions occurred in 13 patients after surgery; in only eight, however, was there evidence of metal sensitivity. These findings indicate that metal-on-metal total joint replacements may sensitise the patient to metals contained in the prosthesis. Although there is a high incidence of prosthesis failure among metal-sensitive patients it remains uncertain whether the loosening causes the sensitisation or vice versa.
Similar articles
-
Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties.Br Med J. 1975 Nov 15;4(5993):374-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5993.374. Br Med J. 1975. PMID: 1192078 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective analysis of the incidence of metal allergy in patients listed for total replacement of the temporomandibular joint.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;52(1):85-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 23850381
-
Sensitivity to metal as a possible cause of sterile loosening after cobalt-chromium total hip-replacement arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Mar;59(2):164-8. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977. PMID: 845199
-
Metal sensitivities and orthopaedic implants revisited: the potential for metal allergy with the new metal-on-metal joint prostheses.Br J Dermatol. 2003 Jun;148(6):1089-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05404.x. Br J Dermatol. 2003. PMID: 12828734 Review.
-
The role of patch testing in the management of dermatitides caused by orthopedic metallic prostheses.Cutis. 1984 Mar;33(3):258, 264. Cutis. 1984. PMID: 6373164 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Infection versus ALVAL: acute presentation with abdominal pain.BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Jun 10;2013:bcr2013009976. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009976. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. PMID: 23761510 Free PMC article.
-
[Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies: joint statement by the implant allergy working group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German association of orthopedics and orthopedic surgery), DKG (German contact dermatitis research group) and dgaki (German society for allergology and clinical immunology)].Orthopade. 2008 Jan;37(1):75-88. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1183-3. Orthopade. 2008. PMID: 18210082 German.
-
Allergic Sensitization to Nickel and Implanted Metal Devices: A Perspective.Dermatitis. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;33(6):396-404. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000819. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Dermatitis. 2022. PMID: 34845168 Free PMC article.
-
Metal release and metal allergy after total hip replacement with resurfacing versus conventional hybrid prosthesis.Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):348-54. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.922730. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Acta Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24930546 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence for active antigen presentation by monocyte/macrophages in response to stimulation with particles: the expression of NFκB transcription factors and costimulatory molecules.Inflammopharmacology. 2013 Aug;21(4):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s10787-013-0170-z. Epub 2013 May 14. Inflammopharmacology. 2013. PMID: 23670535
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources