The effect of technique failure on outcome in black patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
- PMID: 11929145
The effect of technique failure on outcome in black patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Abstract
Background: We previously reported that, while black patients have a better patient survival than white patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), they also have a significantly higher technique failure rate (39% vs 8%, p < 0.0001). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of technique failure/transfer to hemodialysis (HD) on patient survival in black PD patients.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 137 incident black patients entering our PD program from January 1987 to December 1997. During the course of follow-up, 82 (60%) patients remained on PD (PD group) while 55 (40%) patients were permanently transferred to HD (PD-HD group). The primary outcome measured was patient survival.
Results: Average age was 49 +/- 15 years, 42% were male, and 40% had diabetes mellitus. At baseline, serum creatinine was 10.8 +/- 5.4 mg/dL, serum albumin 3.4 +/- 0.7 g/dL, body mass index 27.3 +/- 6.5 kg/m2, peritoneal transport status was high in 18% and high-average in 61%, and residual glomerular filtration rate was 3.4 +/- 3.5 mL/minute. There were no significant differences in clinical features, nutritional status, peritoneal transport, residual renal function, or dialysis adequacy at baseline between the PD group and PD-HD group. While a greater proportion of patients transferring to HD had cardiac disease (53% vs 32%, p < 0.05), there were no other significant differences in 15 comorbid conditions assessed at baseline. The primary reason for transfer was peritonitis (64%) and the overall peritonitis rate in the PD-HD group was significantly higher than in the PD group (2.21 vs 1.17 episodes/patient-year, p < 0.0001). Overall follow-up was 34 +/- 25 months for PD group and 44 +/- 26 months for PD-HD group (p < 0.01), with a mean time on PD prior to transfer to HD of 22 +/- 18 months. During the course of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of patients transplanted or deaths. Patient survival at 1, 2, and 5 years was 91%, 80%, and 57% for PD group and 96%, 92%, and 55% for PD-HD group [p = not significant (NS)]. A risk-adjusted time-dependent Cox regression analysis resulted in an adjusted relative risk of death that was not significantly different for those who transferred from PD to HD versus those who remained on PD (relative risk 1.49; 95% confidence interval 0.77-2.89; p = NS).
Conclusions: In black patients on PD, transfer to HD is not associated with any significant difference in patient survival compared to patients remaining on PD. While a high rate of peritonitis predisposes to technique failure, we found no features at baseline predictive of patients at greatest risk to fail PD. Since technique failure does not portend a poorer prognosis, PD remains a viable option for black patients entering an end-stage renal disease program.
Similar articles
-
Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Survival: A Cohort Study.Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Sep;84(3):298-305.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.03.012. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Am J Kidney Dis. 2024. PMID: 38640994
-
Impact of Obesity on Modality Longevity, Residual Kidney Function, Peritonitis, and Survival Among Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jun;71(6):802-813. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018. PMID: 29223620 Free PMC article.
-
Patient survival among incident peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients in an urban setting.Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Dec;36(6):1175-82. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.19832. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000. PMID: 11096042
-
Outcomes after transfer from hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis vs peritoneal dialysis as initial therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Semin Dial. 2020 Jul;33(4):299-308. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12896. Epub 2020 Jun 29. Semin Dial. 2020. PMID: 32596853
-
Comparison of long-term survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.Adv Perit Dial. 1996;12:79-88. Adv Perit Dial. 1996. PMID: 8865878 Review.
Cited by
-
Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study.BMC Nephrol. 2009 Feb 6;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-10-3. BMC Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19200383 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.Perit Dial Int. 2013 Mar-Apr;33(2):155-66. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00233. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Perit Dial Int. 2013. PMID: 23032086 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison and causes of transfer from one dialysis modality to another.Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Jun;43(2):513-8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9836-2. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011. PMID: 20830521
-
Geographic and temporal trends in peritoneal dialysis services in the United States between 1995 and 2003.Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1079-87. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.01.022. Epub 2010 Apr 10. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010. PMID: 20385435 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous