Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1975 Sep;16(9):738-43.
doi: 10.1136/gut.16.9.738.

Quantitative liver imaging using 131-I Rose Bengal as an index of liver function and prognosis

Comparative Study

Quantitative liver imaging using 131-I Rose Bengal as an index of liver function and prognosis

T R Gamlen et al. Gut. 1975 Sep.

Abstract

A technique for assessing quantitatively hepatic function by direct measurement of liver parenchymal cell uptake of 131I Rose Bengal using a scintillation camera with a digital store and retrieval system is described. Ninety-four studies were performed on 84 patients with a variety of hepatic disorders over a two-year period, the diagnosis in each case being established by liver biopsy or laparotomy. The results were compared with the clinical, biochemical and histological assessment of the patients. A good correlation was found between the half-time for hepatic uptake of 131I Rose Bengal and the histological changes, as well as with clinical prognosis measured in terms of clinical improvement or deterioration to death. The rate of liver uptake was found to be a better index than the clearance of radioisotope from the blood and was superior to conventional biochemical investigations in both icteric and anicteric patients. The test was not shown to be of clinical value in discriminating between intra- and extrahepatic causes of jaundice. It is suggested that this technique may provide a safe and sensitive method for assessing the severity of liver dysfunction and also for monitoring clinical progress, especially in situations where liver biopsy may be unreliable or hazardous.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gut. 1975 May;16(5):394 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dig Dis. 1970 Apr;15(4):337-42 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci. 1967 Oct;33(2):301-12 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci. 1961 Apr;20:149-59 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1964 Aug;43:1677-90 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources