Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Apr;30(4):599-603.
doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00706-2.

Effect of 1 year of discontinuation of raloxifene or estrogen therapy on bone mineral density after 5 years of treatment in healthy postmenopausal women

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of 1 year of discontinuation of raloxifene or estrogen therapy on bone mineral density after 5 years of treatment in healthy postmenopausal women

S J M Neele et al. Bone. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

The beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), or bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women have been well established. However, little is known about the effects of discontinuation of treatment on bone mineral density. We investigated the effect of 1 year of discontinuation of the SERM raloxifene (Ral; 60 mg and 150 mg), conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg), and placebo after 5 years of treatment in a double-blind, randomized study. Thirty-eight of 59 healthy and hysterectomized postmenopausal women (mean age 55 years) completed the treatment and 1 year follow-up period. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) were performed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, before, during, and at the end of treatment, as well as after 1 year of discontinuation of therapy. One year of discontinuation significantly reduced the mean lumbar spine BMD in the raloxifene- and estrogen-treated women (p < 0.05), whereas mean femoral neck BMD was reduced significantly only in women treated with 60 mg Ral (p < 0.05). The mean percentage change (+/-SD) in lumbar spine BMD was: CEE, -6.2% (+/-3.7%); Ral 60 mg, -2.4% (+/-2.4%); Ral 150 mg, -2.6% (+/-3.1%); and placebo, -1.6% (+/-4.3%). Our results show that 5 years of treatment with either Ral or CEE did not protect against bone loss after 1 year of withdrawal of therapy, and that the rate of bone loss was not significantly different from that of placebo-treated women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources