Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):816-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.816.

Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination

Judith Rankin  1 , Chris Wright, Tom Lind
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination

Judith Rankin et al. BMJ. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To describe parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination after the loss of a baby.

Design: Cross sectional survey.

Setting: Hospital with a dedicated bereavement counselling service, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Participants: 258 women who had attended a bereavement counselling service at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, on at least one occasion after losing a baby during pregnancy or infancy, between October 1996 and October 2000.

Method: Self completion postal questionnaire incorporating fixed choice and open ended questions.

Main outcome measures: Number of respondents who were asked if they would agree to a postmortem examination of their baby, and number who agreed to a postmortem examination; reasons for agreeing and not agreeing to a postmortem examination; quality of explanation received; number who regretted their decision to give or withhold consent for a postmortem examination.

Results: 166 (64%) respondents completed the questionnaire. Of these, 148 (89%) had been asked to agree to a postmortem examination on their baby and 120/148 of these respondents (81%) agreed, most of whom recognised benefits resulting from the examination. 101/117 (86%) respondents believed the findings had been explained appropriately. Nine (7%) of the 120 respondents who had agreed to a postmortem examination regretted their decision. Of the respondents who refused an examination, four (14%) had regrets about their decision.

Discussion: Parents viewed the postmortem examination as a useful and necessary tool in helping to discover the reasons why their baby had died. Simplifying the language used to explain findings may further raise parents' understanding of the value of the postmortem examination and ensure that they are satisfied with it. Medical staff involved in consent for postmortem examinations should be fully trained in how to ask for parental consent, the postmortem examination procedure, and how to explain the findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rushton DI. West Midlands perinatal mortality survey, 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:624–627. - PubMed
    1. Cartlidge PHT, Dawson AT, Stewart JH, Vujanic GM. Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. BMJ. 1995;310:155–158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiswick M. Perinatal and infant postmortem examination. BMJ. 1995;310:141–142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vujanic GM, Cartlidge PH, Stewart JH, Dawson AJ. Perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: how well are we doing? J Clin Pathol. 1995;48:998–1001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vujanic GM, Cartlidge PH, Stewart JH. Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:850–853. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types