Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Feb;19(2):59-65.
doi: 10.1055/s-2002-23560.

Children born after assisted reproductive technology

Affiliations
Review

Children born after assisted reproductive technology

André Van Steirteghem et al. Am J Perinatol. 2002 Feb.

Abstract

Since the birth of Louise Brown in July 1978 and the birth of the first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) child in January 1992 many couples with longstanding female-factor or male-factor infertility can be helped to overcome their infertility resulting in a delivery and birth of a child. The final and ultimate goal of all infertility treatments has been to give the large population of infertile couples a chance to fulfil their childwish and experience the happiness of having a healthy child. Major advances have been made in the different treatment protocols for infertility during the last 25 years. It is, however, surprising that only a limited number of studies have been carried out assessing the health of the children born after ART. In this review we shall comment on the limitations of follow-up studies on ART children and we shall review existing data on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ICSI pregnancies. The most important outcome data consist of information on minor and major congenital malformations obtained prenatally or after birth, as well as on the further development of the children.

PubMed Disclaimer