Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Apr;52(477):290-5.

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice

Nick Freemantle et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Br J Gen Pract 2002 Sep;52(482):767

Abstract

Background: Educational outreach visits are commonly used to promote changes in prescribing in family practice. However, the effectiveness of outreach visits has not been evaluated across a range of settings.

Aim: To estimate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits on United Kingdom (UK) general practice prescribing and to examine the extent to which practice characteristics influenced outcome.

Design of study: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: General practices in 12 health authorities in England.

Method: Educational outreach visits were made to practices that received two of four guidelines. Each practice provided data on treatment of patients for all four guidelines for both pre and post-intervention periods. The primary outcome is average effect across all four guidelines. Secondary analyses examined the predictive effect of practice and guideline characteristics.

Results: Seventy per cent of practices approached agreed to take part in the intervention. Overall, educational outreach was associated with a significant improvement in prescribing practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.42]), a 5.2% (95% CI = 1.7% to 8.7%) increase in the number of patients treated within the guideline recommendations. Smaller practices (two or fewer full-time equivalent practitioners) responded much more favourably to educational outreach than larger practices. Smaller practices improved their performance in line with the guidelines by 13.5% (95% CI = 6% to 20.9%) attributable to outreach, while larger practices improved by only 1.4% (95% CI = -2.4% to 5.3%, P-value for interaction <0.001).

Conclusion: In large practices, educational outreach alone is unlikely to achieve worthwhile change. There is good evidence to support the use of educational outreach visits in small practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Commentary on the EBOR trial report.
    Freemantle N, Nazareth I, Wood J, Haines A, Eccles M. Freemantle N, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jul;52(480):587-8. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12120742 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):180-6 - PubMed
    1. Control Clin Trials. 1999 Oct;20(5):479-92 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 16;308(24):1457-63 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):705-11 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms