Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr;19(4):322-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00700.x.

Congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes

Affiliations

Congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes

T Farrell et al. Diabet Med. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the frequency of major congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with gestational diabetes (GDM), classified according to their postpartum glucose tolerance status.

Methods: A prospective study of pregnancies in women with Type 1 diabetes (n = 221), Type 2 diabetes (n = 317) and GDM (n = 1822) between 1985 and 2000 (15 years). Congenital anomalies were detected by antenatal ultrasound or postnatal examination.

Results: The frequency of major congenital anomalies in the offspring was 5.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-9.8) for women with Type 1 diabetes; 4.4% (95% CI 2.4-7.3) for women with Type 2 diabetes; and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-2.0) for women with GDM. Two hundred and thirty-seven women with GDM (13%) had diabetes diagnosed on early (6-week) postpartum glucose tolerance testing. The frequency of major congenital anomalies in their offspring was 4.6% (95% CI 2.3-8.2), compared with 0.9% (95% CI 0.5-1.5) for the remainder of the GDM group (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: GDM is not a homogeneous group with regard to the risk of major congenital anomalies. In those with diabetes on early postpartum testing, who are likely to have had unrecognized Type 2 diabetes antedating their pregnancy, the rate of major congenital anomalies is the same as for women with established Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. In the remainder of the GDM group, the rate does not differ from the non-diabetic background rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources