Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies
- PMID: 11948720
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.10066
Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies
Abstract
This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure-flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice.
Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Comment in
-
Comment on the article "Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies": We would like to share some alternative approaches for the current cough test during the urodynamic study to prevent the transmission of the virus between urodynamcists and patients in the global COVID-19 situation.Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Nov;40(8):2057-2058. doi: 10.1002/nau.24780. Epub 2021 Aug 31. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021. PMID: 34464009 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical