Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Mar;109(3):274-81.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01380.x.

Fetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review

Affiliations

Fetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review

Chahé Mardirosoff et al. BJOG. 2002 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate fetal and maternal adverse effects of intrathecal opioid analgesia during labour.

Data sources: A systematic search was performed, in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, bibliographies, and personal contact with authors, in any language, up to February 2001.

Study: selection Full reports on randomised comparisons of any analgesia with intrathecal opioid (experimental group) with any non-intrathecal opioid regimen (control group) during labour.

Data extraction: Dichotomous data from 24 trials (3513 women).

Results: With intrathecal opioids, there was a significant increase in the risk of fetal bradycardia: odds ratio 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 3.1), number-needed-to-harm 28. The risk of caesarean section due to fetal heart rate abnormalities was similar (6.0% versus 7.8%). The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher with intrathecal opioids: relative risk 29.6 (95% CI 13.6 to 64.6), number-needed-to-harm 1.7.

Conclusions: Intrathecal opioids for labour increase the risk of fetal bradycardia and maternal pruritus. The risk of subsequent caesarean section is not increased.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources