Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Apr;56(4):240-6.
doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25073.

[Effects of a high intensity training program on patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD)]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[Effects of a high intensity training program on patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD)]

[Article in German]
M Hentschel et al. Pneumologie. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

In a controlled/prospective clinical trial we examined 125 patients with moderate COAD, 84 of which performed a high-intensity training program on cycle ergometers.

Methods: All participants (controls n = 39, training-group n = 84, age 48.7 versus 48.1 years, FEV1 62.3 % vs. 63.1 % of predicted) were examined spiroergometrically (ramp protocol, increment 10 W/min), the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined and a training intensity calculated (AT + 40 % of the difference to peak exercise). Training was carried out on cycle ergometers with 5 training units weekly at 40 minutes each. We aimed at a minimum of 22 training units during 4 weeks.

Results: Both groups improved in the lung function at rest (FEV1 + 11 % versus + 12 % in the controls). Only for the training group we found a statistically significant improvement in maximum exercise capacity (O2 uptake + 286.4 ml vs. + 72.4 ml, maximum workrate + 20.0 watts vs. + 5.7 W), of the anaerobic threshold (AT improved by 8.4 watts vs. 5.1 W) as well as in the metabolic load (lactate decreased by 1.3 mmol vs. 0.2 mmol, ventilation decreased by 3.8 l/min vs. 2.3 l/min). In most subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire quality of living improved more clearly in the training group, whereas the LAQ questionnaire showed no group-specific differences and no improvement after training.

Conclusion: We conclude from the result that a high intensity training program can be recommended as a useful and low-risk component in pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

PubMed Disclaimer