Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr:(397):133-42.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00019.

Shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection by pedicled scapular crest graft

Affiliations

Shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection by pedicled scapular crest graft

Sherif N Amin et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

The current authors present and evaluate a technique for reconstructing proximal humeral defects that result after resection of malignant bone tumors. Sixteen patients were included in this study with an average followup of 3 years (range, 12-76 months). Twelve patients had intraarticular resections, two had extraarticular resections, and two had intercalary resections. Reconstruction was done at the lateral border of the scapula (based on the circumflex scapular vessels) that was osteotomized and mobilized to bridge the resultant defect. Shoulder arthrodesis was done in 14 patients and the shoulder was spared in the two patients who had intercalary resections. Function was evaluated according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. The average time for union of the graft proximally and distally was 6 months after which the graft started to hypertrophy. The average functional score was 22.5 points (75%) with a minimum score of 18 points (60%) and a maximum score of 27 points (90%). Nonunion of the distal host-graft junction occurred in two patients; both patients required iliac crest bone grafting and both achieved clinical and radiographic union without additional intervention. In three patients, the proximal fixation became loose but had no effect on function. The authors conclude that this technique is inexpensive, effective, and a durable reconstructive option for proximal humeral defects that are less than 15 cm. It has a predictable functional outcome (60%-90%) that is comparable with other reconstructive options.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources