Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods
- PMID: 11964338
- PMCID: PMC102326
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.942
Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate why some women prefer caesarean sections and how decisions to medicalise birthing are influenced by patients, doctors, and the sociomedical environment.
Design: Population based birth cohort study, using ethnographic and epidemiological methods.
Setting: Epidemiological study: women living in the urban area of Pelotas, Brazil who gave birth in hospital during the study. Ethnographic study: subsample of 80 women selected at random from the birth cohort. Nineteen medical staff were interviewed.
Participants: 5304 women who gave birth in any of the city's hospitals in 1993.
Main outcome measures: Birth by caesarean section or vaginal delivery.
Results: In both samples women from families with higher incomes and higher levels of education had caesarean sections more often than other women. Many lower to middle class women sought caesarean sections to avoid what they considered poor quality care and medical neglect, resulting from social prejudice. These women used medicalised prenatal and birthing health care to increase their chance of acquiring a caesarean section, particularly if they had social power in the home. Both social power and women's behaviour towards seeking medicalised health care remained significantly associated with type of birth after controlling for family income and maternal education.
Conclusions: Fear of substandard care is behind many poor women's preferences for a caesarean section. Variables pertaining to women's role in the process of redefining and negotiating medical risks were much stronger correlates of caesarean section rates than income or education. The unequal distribution of medical technology has altered concepts of good and normal birthing. Arguments supporting interventionist birthing for all on the basis of equal access to health care must be reviewed.
Comment in
-
Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care.BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):928-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.928. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 11964324 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil. Demand should be assessed rather than inferred.BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):335. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12169516 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil. Demand is affected by mothers' perception of good health care.BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):335. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12173616 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13. Midwifery. 2011. PMID: 20630634
-
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Midwifery. 2017. PMID: 28478374
-
'What about the mother?' Women's and caregivers' perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates.Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 30. Midwifery. 2015. PMID: 25886967
-
What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31607640
-
A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.Birth. 2007 Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00193.x. Birth. 2007. PMID: 18021149 Review.
Cited by
-
Preventing urinary incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: a review.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jun;24(6):889-99. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2017-3. Epub 2013 Feb 23. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 23436034 Review.
-
Utilization of antenatal ultrasound scan and implications for caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in rural Eastern China.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Apr 12;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-93. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22494358 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives, Decision Making, and Final Mode of Delivery in Pregnant Women With a Previous C-Section in a General Hospital in Peru: Prospective Analysis.MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Aug 8;2(2):2381468317724409. doi: 10.1177/2381468317724409. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec. MDM Policy Pract. 2017. PMID: 30288428 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean sections and the prevalence of preterm and early-term births in Brazil: secondary analyses of national birth registration.BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 5;8(8):e021538. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021538. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30082353 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean section in Benin and Mali: increased recourse to technology due to suffering and under-resourced facilities.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Jan 14;10:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.12.001. eCollection 2020 Jun. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020. PMID: 32181378 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barros F, Victora C, Morris S. Caesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet. 1996;347:839. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–437. - PubMed
-
- Ash A, Okah D. What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet. 1997;349:1557. - PubMed
-
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk N. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet. 1996;347:544. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical