Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002;92(5):893-902.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01599.x.

Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems

Affiliations

Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems

D J Bolton et al. J Appl Microbiol. 2002.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this research was to examine the effects of preslaughter washing, pre-evisceration washing, final carcass washing and chilling on final carcass quality and to evaluate these operations as possible critical control points (CCPs) within a pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system.

Methods and results: This study estimated bacterial numbers (total viable counts) and the incidence of Salmonella at three surface locations (ham, belly and neck) on 60 animals/carcasses processed through a small commercial pork abattoir (80 pigs d(-1)). Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers were noted at some stages of the slaughter/dressing process, i.e. the process of hair removal (scalding-dehairing and singeing) resulted in an approx. 4.5 log10 cfu cm(-2) decrease in bacterial numbers. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers was observed after pre-evisceration washing. Final washing increased the bacterial counts to between 3.6 and 3.8 log10 cfu cm(-2) while chilling effected a small but statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase to between 4.5 and 4.7 log10 cfu cm(-2). The incidence of Salmonella on pigs at the farm was 27%, decreasing to 10% after preslaughter washing. However, stunning and bleeding effected a considerable increase in Salmonella contamination and the incidence after these operations was 50%, which was reduced to 0% during the scalding-dehairing process.

Conclusions: Washing the live animals and subsequent carcasses with cold water is not an effective control measure but chilling may be used as a CCP.

Significance and impact of the study: Recent changes in European Union legislation legally mandate HACCP in pork slaughter plants. This research will provide a sound scientific basis on which to develop and implement effective HACCP in pork abattoirs.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources