Randomised trial of endoscopy with testing for Helicobacter pylori compared with non-invasive H pylori testing alone in the management of dyspepsia
- PMID: 11976239
- PMCID: PMC102780
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7344.999
Randomised trial of endoscopy with testing for Helicobacter pylori compared with non-invasive H pylori testing alone in the management of dyspepsia
Erratum in
- BMJ 2002 Aug 31;325(7362):479
- BMJ 2002 Sep 14;325(7364):580
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of non-invasive testing for Helicobacter pylori with that of endoscopy (plus H pylori testing) in the management of patients referred for endoscopic investigation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms.
Design: Randomised controlled trial with follow up at 12 months.
Setting: Hospital gastroenterology unit.
Participants: 708 patients aged under 55 referred for endoscopic investigation of dyspepsia, randomised to non-invasive breath test for H pylori or endoscopy plus H pylori testing.
Main outcome measure: Glasgow dyspepsia severity score at one year. Use of medical resources, patient oriented outcomes, and safety were also assessed.
Results: In 586 patients followed up at 12 months the mean change in dyspepsia score was 4.8 in the non-invasive H pylori test group and 4.6 in the endoscopy group (95% confidence interval for difference -0.7 to 0.5, P=0.69). Only 8.2% of patients followed up who were randomised to breath test alone were referred for subsequent endoscopy. The use of non-endoscopic resources was similar in the two groups. Reassurance value, concern about missed pathology, overall patient satisfaction, and quality of life were similar in the two groups. The patients found the non-invasive breath test procedure less uncomfortable and distressing than endoscopy with or without sedation. No potentially serious pathology requiring treatment other than eradication of H pylori was missed.
Conclusion: In this patient group, non-invasive testing for H pylori is as effective and safe as endoscopy and less uncomfortable and distressing for the patient. Non-invasive H pylori testing should be the preferred mode of investigation.
Figures


Comment in
-
Noninvasive Helicobacter pylori testing was as effective as endoscopy for managing dyspepsia.ACP J Club. 2003 Jan-Feb;138(1):16-7. ACP J Club. 2003. PMID: 12511128 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Helicobacter pylori breath test: a surrogate marker for peptic ulcer disease in dyspeptic patients.Gut. 1997 Mar;40(3):302-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.40.3.302. Gut. 1997. PMID: 9135516 Free PMC article.
-
Can the urea breath test for H.pylori replace endoscopy for the assessment of dyspepsia in primary care?N Z Med J. 1998 Jan 23;111(1058):11-4. N Z Med J. 1998. PMID: 9484427
-
Helicobacter pylori test and eradicate versus prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients: 6.7 year follow up of a randomised trial.Gut. 2004 Dec;53(12):1758-63. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043570. Gut. 2004. PMID: 15542510 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Should non-invasive Helicobacter pylori testing replace endoscopy in investigation of dyspepsia?Helicobacter. 2000;5 Suppl 1:S11-5; discussion S27-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2000.0050s1011.x. Helicobacter. 2000. PMID: 10828749 Review.
-
Management strategies for Helicobacter pylori-seropositive patients with dyspepsia: clinical and economic consequences.Ann Intern Med. 1997 Feb 15;126(4):280-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-4-199702150-00004. Ann Intern Med. 1997. PMID: 9036800 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Vietnamese Patients with Acute Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Prospective Study.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:3845067. doi: 10.1155/2017/3845067. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017. PMID: 28133477 Free PMC article.
-
[Seven or ten days? Cost-effectiveness study on the duration of H. pylori treatment in primary care].Aten Primaria. 2006 Dec;38(10):555-62. doi: 10.1157/13095927. Aten Primaria. 2006. PMID: 17198608 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Treatment and management of Helicobacter pylori infection.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002 Dec;4(6):471-7. doi: 10.1007/s11894-002-0023-1. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002. PMID: 12441037 Review.
-
Rate and yield of repeat upper endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 May 28;16(20):2520-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2520. World J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20503451 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of overuse: A view on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):178-189. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.178. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30670908 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ofman JJ, Rabeneck L. The effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia: a qualitative systematic review. Am J Med. 1999;106:335–346. - PubMed
-
- Asante MA, Mendall M, Patel P, Ballam L, Northfield TC. A randomized trial of endoscopy vs no endoscopy in the management of seronegative Helicobacter pylori dyspepsia. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;10:983–989. - PubMed
-
- Patel P, Khulusi S, Mendall MA, Lloyd R, Jazrawi R, Maxwell JD, et al. Prospective screening of dyspeptic patients by Helicobacter pylori serology. Lancet. 1995;346:1315–1318. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical