Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 May;99(5 Pt 1):745-50.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01957-9.

Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial

Pierre Ludovic Giacalone et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Pfannenstiel incision with transverse muscle-cutting Maylard incision in women who had cesarean delivery.

Methods: Patients were assigned randomly to a Pfannenstiel or Maylard incision. Postoperative treatment was similar for each group. Surgical characteristics, complications, postoperative pain (visual analog scale, analgesic use), and related quality of life (1- and 3-month self-administered questionnaires) were analyzed. Abdominal wall muscle recovery was compared objectively by dynamometer.

Results: Fifty-four women had a Pfannenstiel incision and 43 had the Maylard incision. There were no differences in intraoperative characteristics, postoperative morbidity, or pain. Women's responses to the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire at 1 and 3 months postoperatively and clinical and isokinetic testing for abdominal wall strength were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Transecting the rectus muscle was no more deleterious than the Pfannenstiel incision. There was no difference in objectively measured abdominal wall strength.

PubMed Disclaimer