Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 May;9(3):639-48.
doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.3.639-648.2002.

Quantitation of immunoglobulin to hepatitis E virus by enzyme immunoassay

Affiliations

Quantitation of immunoglobulin to hepatitis E virus by enzyme immunoassay

Bruce L Innis et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 May.

Abstract

We developed a quantitative enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for antibody to hepatitis E virus (HEV) by using truncated HEV capsid protein expressed in the baculovirus system to improve seroepidemiology, to contribute to hepatitis E diagnosis, and to enable vaccine evaluations. Five antigen lots were characterized; we used a reference antiserum to standardize antigen potency. We defined Walter Reed antibody units (WR U) with a reference antiserum by using the four-parameter logistic model, established other reference pools as assay standards, and determined the conversion factor: 1 WR U/ml = 0.125 World Health Organization unit (WHO U) per ml. The EIA performed consistently; median intra- and inter-test coefficients of variation were 9 and 12%, respectively. The accurate minimum detection limit with serum diluted 1:1,000 was 5.6 WR U/ml; the test could detect reliably a fourfold antibody change. In six people followed from health to onset of hepatitis E, the geometric mean antibody level rose from 7.1 WR U/ml to 1,924.6 WR U/ml. We used the presence of 56- and 180-kDa bands by Western blotting as a confirmatory test and to define true-negative and -positive serum specimens. A receiver-operating characteristics plot identified 30 WR U/ml as an optimum cut-point (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 89%). The EIA detected antibody more sensitively than a commercially available test. The EIA was transferred to another laboratory, where four operators matched reference laboratory results for a panel of unknowns. Quantitation of antibody to HEV and confirmation of its specificity by Western blotting make HEV serology more meaningful.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
SDS-PAGE analysis of five rHEV antigens lots stained with colloidal Coomassie blue. Lot 4b was 62-kDa antigen, and all other lots were 56-kDa antigen.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Western blots of two rHEV antigen lots run with Sf9 host cell antigens (7 μg of each sample, denatured without mercaptoethanol); blots are probed with normal human control antiserum (A), pool 1 human antiserum to HEV (B), monoclonal antibody to HEV capsid (C), and antiserum to Sf9 cells infected with baculovirus (D).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Parallel line assay comparing three reference antibodies: the WHO reference standard (Std.) (dashed line), pool 4 (dotted line), and pool 1 (solid line).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Plots of the HRP label (TAG), midrange positive control (Pool 5), negative control (Neg), and no-serum control (Antigen) over 50 technically adequate assays.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Levels of antibody to HEV in six patients with hepatitis E determined before infection, when acutely ill (vertical reference line at day 0), and during convalescence. The lower horizontal reference line is the more specific assay cut-point (40 WR U/ml), and the upper reference line is the geometric mean level of acute illness antibody (1,925 WR U/ml).
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Histogram of EIA values in specimen sets from donors lacking plausible exposure to HEV. The top panel includes 178 infants and children from Bangkok, Thailand (mean = 3.6 WR U/ml, SD = 3.1). The bottom panel includes 360 adults from the United States (mean = 7.1 WR U/ml, SD = 6.1).
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Western blot confirmation test. Lanes: 1, pool 5 positive control; 2, negative control; 3, negative specimen with 30 WR U/ml; 4, positive specimen with 56 WR U/ml; 5, positive specimen with 137 WR U/ml; 6, positive specimen with 713 WR U/ml.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
Receiver-operating characteristics plot for EIA based on true-negative and -positive samples defined by Western blotting.
FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.
Comparison of antibody quantitation by WRAIR and Genelabs Technologies EIA. The dashed horizontal reference line is the cut-point for the Genelabs test.

References

    1. Armitage, P., and G. Berry. 1987. Statistical methods in medical research, 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, Mass.
    1. Bryan, J. P., S. A. Tsarev, M. Iqbal, J. Ticehurst, S. U. Emerson, A. Ahmed, J. Duncan, A. R. Rafiqui, I. A. Malik, R. H. Purcell, and L. J. Legters. 1994. Epidemic hepatitis E in Pakistan: patterns of serologic response and evidence that antibody to hepatitis E virus protects against disease. J. Infect. Dis. 170:517-521. - PubMed
    1. Clayson, E. T., K. S. Myint, R. Snitbhan, D. W. Vaughn, B. L. Innis, L. Chan, P. Cheung, and M. P. Shrestha. 1995. Viremia, fecal shedding, and IgM and IgG responses in patients with hepatitis E. J. Infect. Dis. 172:927-933. - PubMed
    1. Dawson, G. J., K. H. Chau, C. M. Cabal, P. O. Yarbough, G. R. Reyes, and I. K. Mushahwar. 1992. Solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for hepatitis E virus IgG and IgM antibodies utilizing recombinant antigens and synthetic peptides. J. Virol. Methods 38:175-186. - PubMed
    1. Favorov, M. O., H. A. Fields, M. A. Purdy, T. L. Yashina, A. G. Aleksandrov, M. J. Alter, D. M. Yarasheva, D. W. Bradley, and H. S. Margolis. 1992. Serologic identification of hepatitis E virus infection in epidemic and endemic settings. J. Med. Virol. 36:246-250. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources