The McKeown thesis: a historical controversy and its enduring influence
- PMID: 11988435
- PMCID: PMC1447153
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.725
The McKeown thesis: a historical controversy and its enduring influence
Abstract
The historical analyses of Thomas McKeown attributed the modern rise in the world population from the 1700s to the present to broad economic and social changes rather than to targeted public health or medical interventions. His work generated considerable controversy in the 1970s and 1980s, and it continues to stimulate support, criticism, and commentary to the present day, in spite of his conclusions' having been largely discredited by subsequent research. The ongoing resonance of his work is due primarily to the importance of the question that underlay it: Are public health ends better served by targeted interventions or by broad-based efforts to redistribute the social, political, and economic resources that determine the health of populations?
Comment in
-
Rethinking McKeown.Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1032; author reply 1032-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1032. Am J Public Health. 2003. PMID: 12835163 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Caldwell JC. Demography and social science. Popul Stud. 1996;50:314. - PubMed
-
- McKeown T, Brown RG. Medical evidence related to English population changes in the eighteenth century. Popul Stud. 1955;9:119–141.
-
- McKeown T, Record RG. Reasons for the decline of mortality in England and Wales during the nineteenth century. Popul Stud. 1962;16:94–122. - PubMed
-
- McKeown T, Brown RG, Record RG. An interpretation of the modern rise of population in Europe. Popul Stud. 1972;26:345–382. - PubMed
-
- McKeown T, Record RG, Turner RD. An interpretation of the decline of mortality in England and Wales during the twentieth century. Popul Stud. 1975;29:391–422. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
