Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Apr;33(4):273-8.

Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11989376
Comparative Study

Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching

Valeria V Gordan et al. Quintessence Int. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different cavity designs, cavity depths, and shade matching on the dimensions of Class I resin-based composite preparations during replacement of the restoration.

Method and materials: Forty Class I cavity preparations were prepared in extracted premolars. The occlusal depths varied from 1.5 to 2.5 mm. In 20 teeth, the buccal and lingual walls were perpendicular to the pulpal floor; in another 20, they were divergent to the pulpal floor. Impressions were made of all preparations. The cavities were restored with resin-based composite. All subgroups were further divided into another two subgroups (n = 5), in which half of the teeth were restored with shade that matched the tooth and the other half were restored with a resin composite that was three shades different from the tooth. After 168 hours in distilled water, the restorations were removed. New impressions were made, and a total of 80 stone casts were fabricated. The perimeter and area of the restorations were recorded with a video-based imaging system. The dimensions of the postoperative cavity preparations were compared to the initial cavity sizes.

Results: The depth of the original cavity preparation had a statistically significant effect on the change in cavity dimension, as measured by area and perimeter. The 2.5-mm-deep cavities showed greater loss of tooth structure. No statistically significant difference was found for different cavity designs or shade matching.

Conclusion: Replacement of Class I resin-based composite restorations results in loss of tooth structure. The deeper the original cavity preparation, the greater the loss of tooth structure at the occlusal cavosurface margin during replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms